期刊文献+

范畴边界清晰性与语义的清晰性——兼论不同范畴观的对立与语言研究的分歧 被引量:7

范畴边界清晰性与语义的清晰性——兼论不同范畴观的对立与语言研究的分歧
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经典范畴理论对20世纪的语言学研究产生了深刻的影响。当代认知语言学的原型范畴理论对经典范畴理论提出了挑战,两种范畴观的主要分歧之一便是范畴是否有明晰的边界,经典范畴观认为范畴具有明晰的边界,而原型范畴观则主张边界的模糊性。本文通过对词义的具体分析得出结论:原性范畴理论并没有超越经典范理论,充分必要条件决定范畴及范畴成员之间的边界,而这一边界是明晰。这一结论在符号学和语言哲学等相关领域皆可得到证明。 The classical category has greatly influenced the linguistic research in the 20th century, but the modem cognitive linguistics poses a challenge to the classic category theory with its prototype theory. The main controversy between the classical and the prototype category theories is whether there is a clear bounderline between two categories or category menbers. The classical category theory acknowledges the clarity or discreteness of bounderline, but the prototype category theory says no. This paper attempts to show through analysis of linguistic evidence that the prototypical category fails to exceed the classical one, that the category is determined by sufficient & necessary conditions, and that the bounderline is clear. All of these can get proved in semiology and philosophy.
作者 熊锟
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第8期23-26,共4页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 范畴 边界 清晰性 家族相似性 category bounderline clarity,family resemblance
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Givon,T.Syntax.An Introduction.Vdume Ⅱ.Amsterdam.John Banjamins,2001. 被引量:1
  • 2Langacker,R.W.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.Ⅰ:Theoretical Prerequisites[M].Stanford University Press,1987. 被引量:1
  • 3Smith,Linda B.& Larissa K.Samuelson.Perceiving and Remembering:Category Stability,Variability and Development[A].In Koen Lamberts & David Shanks.Knowledge,Concepts and Categories[C].Hove:Psychology Press,1997. 被引量:1
  • 4Taylor,John R.Linguistic Categorization:Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995. 被引量:1
  • 5Ungerer,F.& H.J,Schmid.An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics[M].Beijing,Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001. 被引量:1
  • 6Wittgenstein,L.Philosophical Investigation[M].Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1953. 被引量:1
  • 7蓝纯著..认知语言学与隐喻研究[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2005:223.
  • 8老子.陈忠译评.道德经[M].长春:吉林文史出版社,2004. 被引量:5
  • 9李小飞.范畴边界的动态构建研究[J].山东外语教学,2006,27(5):43-47. 被引量:8
  • 10贾志高,程杰.隐喻语言中的范畴化[J].山东师范大学外国语学院学报(基础英语教育),2000,4(2):29-32. 被引量:5

二级参考文献20

共引文献35

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部