摘要
从身体的维度出发,揭示了西方哲学对“身体性”问题两种截然不同的解答：其一,传统西方哲学将肉体和心灵的关系置于一种对立二元论的基本构架中,使肉体在意识哲学中一直处于一种隐匿和遮蔽的状态。其二,后现代哲学家用“肉体”来反抗意识哲学的独断性。展开了所谓的“哲学肉身化”运动,又将肉体以及与肉体相关的一切推上了至高无上的地位。以上这两种哲学在“身体性”问题上仍然是一种“非此即彼”的、“独白式”的主体性哲学,而要真正解决“身体性”问题,只有坚持的一种“身体间性”维度的现象学精神,才可能达到“身心合一”的完美之境。
From the dimension of the body, the paper has disclosed two diametrically different solutions to the ＂bodyness＇＂ problem in western philosophy. The one is that western philosophy puts the relation between flesh and mind in a basic framework of opposite dualism, making flesh always in a hidden and shielded status. The other is that post-modern philosophers use ＂ flesh＂ to resist against arbitrariness of ideological philosophy, launch a so-called ＂philosophy corporality＂ campaign and then bring flesh and everything related to flesh to a supreme position. With respect to the problem of the ＂bodynesa＂ , the above two philosophies are still a philosophy of subject nature featuring ＂one or the other＂ and ＂monologue type＂. If it is really needed to tackle the ＂bodyness＂ problem, only by sticking to the spirit of the phenomenology of the dimension of the ＂ interbodyness＂ , can a perfect situation of ＂integrating body and mind into a whole＂ be achieved.
出处
《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2006年第5期76-82,共7页
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences
关键词
西方哲学
肉体
心灵
身体
身体间性
western philosophy
flesh
mind
body
inter-bodyness
