期刊文献+

意外地点任务中不同测试问题及意图理解与执行功能的关系 被引量:16

Relations between Different Test Questions of Unexpected Transfer Task,Understanding of Intention and Executive Function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在讨论意外地点任务中“知否问题”与“预测问题”可能存在的差异及两者与执行功能任务的关系,并初步探讨意图理解与执行功能问的关系。用意外地点任务、膝跳反射任务和两个执行功能的任务(DCCS和手部游戏)对59名3~5岁的儿童施测。结果显示:(1)儿童在意外地点任务的“知否问题”上的表现显著好于“预测问题”,儿童对“知否问题”和“预测问题”的回答可能反映了心理理论发展的不同阶段。(2)膝跳反射任务,DCCS任务与“知否问题”三者问有显著的相关,且其高相关在排除年龄及语言能力的影响后仍保持显著。“双表征区分结构”可能是三者间共同的成分。 This study aimed to discuss the possible difference between "knowing/not knowing question" and "predict question " of unexpected transfer task and the relations between these two questions and executive function tasks. Also we test the relation between the ability to understand intentional action and executive function tasks. The unexpected transfer task, the knee-jerk reflex task and two executive function tasks (Dimensional Change Card Sorting Test and hand game) were given to 59 children aged 3, 4 and 5 years old. The results showed that children's performance on " knowing/not knowing question" was significantly better than on "predict question ". These two questions may reflect children's different developmental level of TOM. The relationship between DCCS task, the knee-jerk reflex task and the "knowing/not knowing question" are so strong even after age and verbal intelligence are partialled out. We supposed that they need a common ability that is to form different representations for different approximate objects. We call this differentiated representations about two approximate objects as dual differentiated representations.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期207-215,共9页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目"情绪调节机制对儿童环境适应与创新的影响"(项目批准号:KSCX2-SW-221)子课题"儿童情绪与认知过程的交互作用" 西南师范大学国家级重点学科重大项目(西国重04019)的部分工作
关键词 心理理论 执行功能 意图 双表征区分结构 theory of mind, executive function, dual differentiated representations, intention.
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Lang B,Perner J.Understanding of intention and false belief and the development of self-control.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2002,20(1):67 ~76 被引量:1
  • 2李红,高山,王乃弋.执行功能研究方法评述[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):693-705. 被引量:82
  • 3Wimmer H,Perner J.Belief about beliefs:Representation and the constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.Cognition,1983,13:103 ~ 128 被引量:1
  • 4Hughes C,Russell J.Autistic children's difficulty with mental disengagement from an object:Its implication for theories of autism.Developmental Psychology,1993,29:498 ~510 被引量:1
  • 5王江洋.学前儿童心理理论与抑制性控制关系研究进展[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2003,26(1):38-42. 被引量:10
  • 6Russell J,Mauthner N,Sharpe S,Tidswell T.The ' windows task'as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1991,9:331 ~349 被引量:1
  • 7Frye D,Zelazo P D,Palfai T.Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning.Cognitive Development,1995,10:483 ~527 被引量:1
  • 8Carlson S M,Moses L J.Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind.Child Development,2001,72:1032~ 1053 被引量:1
  • 9丁芳,李其维.幼儿心理理论与执行功能关系的研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):544-549. 被引量:13
  • 10Shultz T R,Wells D,Sarda M.The development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes,reflexes,and passive movements.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,1980,19:301~310 被引量:1

二级参考文献136

  • 1邓赐平,桑标,缪小春.幼儿心理理论发展的一般认知基础——不同心理理论任务表现的特异性与一致性[J].心理科学,2002,25(5):531-534. 被引量:37
  • 2[1]Carlson, S.M., & Moses, L.J..Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind[J]. Child Development, 2001(72):1032-1053. 被引量:1
  • 3[2]Moses, L.J.Executive accounts of theory-of-mind development[J]. Child Development, 2001(72):688-690. 被引量:1
  • 4[3]Carlson, S.M., Moses, L.J., & Hix, H.R.The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief[J]. Child Development, 1998(69):672-691. 被引量:1
  • 5[4]Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., & Watson, J.Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief[J]. Child Development,2001(72):655-684. 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Perner, J., Lang, B., & Kloo, D.Theory of mind and self-control: more than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, 2002(73):752-767. 被引量:1
  • 7[15]Zelazo P D, Reznick J S, Pinon D E. Response control and the execution of verbal rules. Developmental Psychology, 1995, 31: 508~517 被引量:1
  • 8[16]Hughes C. Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1998, 16: 233~253 被引量:1
  • 9[17]Grant D A, Berg E A. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1994, 38: 404~411 被引量:1
  • 10[18]Feldman M J, Drasgow J. A visual-verbal test for schizophrenia. Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement, 1951, 25: 55~64 被引量:1

共引文献247

同被引文献415

引证文献16

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部