摘要
罗尔斯、海耶克和诺齐克的自由公正论,将自由与公正以及自由的原则与正义的原则等同起来。罗尔斯从自由的原则与正义的原则相等同的前提出发,得出基本权利完全平等与非基本权利比例平等的社会正义原则。海耶克同样从等同正义的原则与自由的原则出发,却得出了另一种结论:社会正义是一种实际上并不存在的主观幻象,亦即所谓“社会正义的幻象”。诺齐克从等同正义与自由出发,也同样错误地得出结论说:除了自由交换,一切社会正义原则都因其模式化而违反自由原则。
The theories of freedom and justice by Rawls, Hayek and Nozick equate freedom with justice or equate the principle of freedom with the principle of justice. Based on the premise that the principle of freedom equates the principle of justice, Rawls has reached his principle of social justice, that is, the basic rights are totally equal while other rights are proportionally equal. Based on the same premise, however, Hayek reached another conclusion, that is, social justice is only a subjective illusion that is called “illusion of social justice”. Nozick equates justice with freedom and reaches a wrong conclusion, that is, besides free exchanges, all the principles of social justice are against the principle of freedom because of their standardization.
出处
《思想战线》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期24-26,33,共4页
Thinking
关键词
自由
公正
自由原则
公正原则
freedom
justice
principle of freedom
principle of justice
