期刊文献+

社会公正理论辩难 被引量:3

Arguments on Social Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 只有贡献论才是社会公正理论之真理,而其他社会公正理论皆为谬误。但这些错误的社会公正理论,没有一种是完全错误的。因为不论哪一种,不论如何错误,却毕竟都确立了某种正确的社会公正原则。只不过,这些正确原则或者无不属于贡献原则,或者无不可以从贡献原则推导出来。首先,平等主义所主张的正确的社会公正原则最多,如基本权利完全平等与非基本权利比例平等以及机会平等和结果平等(政治平等和经济平等)诸原则。这些原则在平等主义论者那里虽然并非皆由贡献原则推导出来,却都能够从贡献原则推导出来,因而都可以属于贡献原则范畴。其次,需要论所主张的正确社会公正原则最少,只有一条,亦即按基本需要分配人权原则:这一条原则实际上乃是按照每个人同样缔结社会的贡献分配人权,因而属于贡献原则范畴。最后,自由公正论所主张的正确的社会公正原则是两个平等原则———基本权利完全平等与非基本权利比例平等———因而也可以属于贡献原则范畴。所以,贡献论囊括了全部正确的社会公正原则,因而堪称社会公正理论之全面真理。 Only the theory of contribution is the truth among the theories of social justice;all other theories are wrong. However, none of them is completely wrong, for whatever wrong theory it is and no matter how wrong it is, it adapts certain principle in social justice that belongs to the theory of contribution or is deducted from it. Firstly, the equalism has the most principles on social justice, e. g. the basic rights are completely equal, the non-basic rights are equal in portion, and the equal in chance and consequence (equal in politics and economy). Though these principles in the eyes of the equalists are not all deducted from the theory of contribution, they can be deducted from the theory of contribution and thus they belong to the category of contribution theory. Secondly, the theory of needs has the fewest principle ; the only one principle in it is to distribute human right according to the basic needs. However, the nature of this principle is to distribute human rights according to the contribution to society, thus it also belongs to the category of the contribution theory. Lastly, the right principles of social justice by the theory of free justice are two equal principles, i. e. the complete equal in basic right and the non-basic rights are equal in portion; they belong to the category of contribution theory, either. Therefore, the theory of contribution includes all the right principles of social justice and is the truth of social justice.
作者 王海明
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第2期17-32,共16页 Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 贡献 索取 权利 义务 仁爱原则 公正原则 自由原则 contribution, demand right duty principle of kindheartedness principle of justice principle of freedom
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1(美)迈克尔·沃尔泽(Michael,Walzer)著,褚松燕译..正义诸领域 为多元主义与平等一辩[M].南京:译林出版社,2002:450.
  • 2李强著..自由主义[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998:284.
  • 3(英)霍布豪斯(L.T.Hobhouse)著,朱曾汶译..自由主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996:126.
  • 4顾建光译,盛庆〓.功利主义新论[M]上海交通大学出版社,1996. 被引量:1
  • 5(英)米,勒(Miller,David),(英)波格丹诺(Bogdanor,Vernon)编,邓正来主编,中国问题研究所等译..布莱克维尔政治学百科全书[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1992:828.
  • 6(美)奥肯(Okun,A.M.)著,王奔洲,叶南奇译..平等与效率 重大的抉择[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987:109.
  • 7(法)巴贝夫(G.)著,(法)韦耶德,G.编,梅溪译..巴贝夫文选 附导论、题解和注释[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962:98.
  • 8(法)德萨米(T.Desamy)著,冀甫译..公有法典[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1958:301.

同被引文献65

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部