摘要
在确定《中华人民共和国民法典》第979条为适法无因管理的前提下,若以德国法学界目前关于无因管理的通说为基础,则不适法无因管理及不法管理的规则可能存在于《中华人民共和国民法典》第980条。但是,借鉴德国模式解释我国无因管理规定,不论是管理人的返还义务还是受益人的追认,相关解释都将遭遇一定的阻碍。从条文规定本身的体系性及逻辑性来看,妥当的解释结论应当是《中华人民共和国民法典》无因管理章并未规制不适法无因管理与不法管理,其仅调整适法无因管理,即其采纳的是“适法无因管理模式”。
Based on the classification of negotiorum gestio in German law,on the premise of determining that Article 979of the Civil Code is legal management without mandate,the rules of unauthorized management without a mandate and presumptuous management may exist in Article 980of the Civil Code.However,referring to the German model to explain the existing rules for negotiorum gestio,whether it is about the return of the administrator or the ratification of the beneficiary,the interpretation will encounter certain obstacles.From the systematic and logical nature of the regulations themselves,it should be considered that the chapter on negotiorum gestio in the Civil Code does not regulate unauthorized management without a mandate and presumptuous management,but only regulates legal management without mandate.
出处
《法商研究》
北大核心
2023年第4期160-173,共14页
Studies in Law and Business
关键词
无因管理
利润剥夺
完全赔偿
得利返还
negotiorum gestio
disgorgement of profits
full-compensation
restitution of unjust enrichment
