摘要
我国家事程序正在从普通民事程序中分离。家事审判实行职权探知主义已系共识,但裁判资料的形成与事实调查权的具体配置,却仍处于理论盲区、制度空白、实务混乱的状态。"当事人权"作为分析工具,既可以从理论上区分中国以诉讼体制定义的诉讼模式论与大陆法系诉讼结构模式论下的辩论主义和职权主义,又可以从制度上厘清家事审判在职权主义原则下法官特有的事实调查权和当事人协助义务,与普通民事诉讼在辩论主义原则下的当事人自治及其例外情形,以及超越诉讼模式而基于诉讼主体地位无差别共享的"当事人权"及其相应的主体义务三者之间在适用范围、适用条件及法律后果上的差异,从而探求我国家事审判从普通民事诉讼体系中剥离后职权探知的限度。
In the process of the separation of family procedure from ordinary civil procedure,there is a consensus on the doctrine of judicial discovery of facts in family cases.However,the rules and theories of the specific allocation of power and duty of proof collection and fact investigation are still missing or confusing.The concept of"basic rights of litigants"introduced here as a new theoretical analysis tool is helpful,which can define judicial power of fact investigation specially operated in family trials and the"basic rights of litigants"that transcend any trial mode but are based on the status as a party of the litigation(a litigation body),who undertakes corresponding basic obligations.In this way,the limits of judicial power of fact investigation after the family trial is separated from the ordinary civil litigation system can be explored.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期243-264,共22页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:19YJC820028)阶段性成果
关键词
家事案件
家事审判
职权探知
当事人权
Family Cases
Family Trials
Exploration of Authority
Basic Rights of Litigants
