期刊文献+

风险分担对工程项目管理绩效影响的实证研究 被引量:29

Research on the Influence of Risk Allocation to Construction Project Management Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过理论分析解构了工程项目的风险分担整体框架,构建了以风险初次分担为前因、风险再分担为中介、工程项目管理绩效为结果的概念模型,并运用结构方程模型的方法进行实证检验。研究结果表明:(1)风险初次分担与风险再分担之间具有显著的互补与联动关系;(2)风险初次分担,尤其是其中的事后支持制度对工程项目管理绩效的总影响效应显著;(3)风险再分担的实施效率对工程项目管理绩效具有显著的正向影响,而风险再分担规模的影响并不显著。本研究有利于引导工程项目交易双方制定更为合理的风险分担方案,从而促使项目成功。 Through a thorough literature review,the whole framework of risk allocation in construction project is broken down and a conceptual model including the first risk allocation,the risk reallocation and the construction project management performance is developed.Then the model is tested using structural equation modeling. The main findings are as follows:(1) first risk allocation and risk reallocation complement each other highly;(2) first risk allocation,especially the ex post supporting institution of it,has strong impact(both direct and indirect) on construction project management performance;(3) the efficiency of risk reallocation has strong positive impact on construction project management performance,while the scale of risk reallocation has no impact on it. In summary,this study can help lead the owner and the contractor to more proper risk allocation,and this can contribute to project success.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期46-55,共10页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71002066 71172175)
关键词 风险分担 项目管理绩效 交易成本 不完全契约 结构方程模型 risk allocation,project management performance,transaction costs,incomplete contract,structural equation modeling(SEM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1杜亚灵,尹贻林.不完全契约视角下的工程项目风险分担框架研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2012,18(1):65-70. 被引量:31
  • 2Katrin Fischer,Katja Leidel,Alexander Riemann,Hans Wilhelm Alfen.An integrated risk management system (IRMS) for PPP projects[J].Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction.2010(3) 被引量:1
  • 3宋金波,宋丹荣,孙岩.垃圾焚烧发电BOT项目的关键风险:多案例研究[J].管理评论,2012,24(9):40-48. 被引量:32
  • 4Xiao-Hua Jin,Guomin Zhang.Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks[J].International Journal of Project Management.2010(5) 被引量:1
  • 5Essam K. Zaneldin.Construction claims in United Arab Emirates: Types, causes, and frequency[J].International Journal of Project Management.2006(5) 被引量:1
  • 6A.K. Choudhury,Ravi Shankar,M.K. Tiwari.Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology[J].Decision Support Systems.2005(3) 被引量:1
  • 7Martinus P. Abednego,Stephen O. Ogunlana.Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public–private partnerships in Indonesia[J].International Journal of Project Management.2006(7) 被引量:3
  • 8Garshasb Khazaeni,Mostafa Khanzadi,Abas Afshar.Fuzzy adaptive decision making model for selection balanced risk allocation[J].International Journal of Project Management.2011(4) 被引量:1
  • 9Joseph H.L. Chan,Daniel W.M. Chan,Patrick T.I. Lam,Albert P.C. Chan.Preferred risk allocation in target cost contracts in construction[J].Facilities.2011(13) 被引量:1
  • 10王守清,柯永建编著..特许经营项目融资 BOT、PFI和PPP[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008:341.

二级参考文献60

共引文献72

同被引文献267

引证文献29

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部