摘要
最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于《信息网络犯罪司法解释》的效力应当追溯到相关刑法条文的施行期间,对于该解释出台后尚未处理或者正在处理中的案件,直接适用该解释的规定。文章同时还对"虚假信息"、行为人"主观明知"、互联网公共属性的认定问题等相关内容进行了分析。
The effect of 'Judicial Interpretation of Information Network Crime'of Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate can be traced back to the implementation of the relevant provisions of the criminal law,and the cases not handled or being handled after the interpretation comes into being are applicable for the provisions. The article also analyzes the identification of 'false information','subjective knowledge'of perpetrator,and Internet public property.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2016年第2期36-40,共5页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
信息网络犯罪
虚假信息
主观明知
information network crime
false information
subjective knowledge