摘要
在司法领域,虽然在法理概念的准确内涵上尚未形成普遍共识,但是其外延范围大致包括法律原则、政策和理论学说等内容,能够作为补充性法源和说理论证的重要理由。最高人民法院公布的指导性案例中包含着非常丰富的法理实践。法理在指导性案例中受到高度重视有着多种原因:定位于疑难案件的指导性案例需要法理作为辅助性法律渊源;法理能够成为指导性案例的权威性论证理由;来源于本土司法实践的指导性案例也能够体现出"中国法理"的独特之处。要进一步提升指导性案例中法理的积极效果,最高人民法院应当大幅增加指导性案例的数量,并在裁判理由部分专门突显法理的作用;地方法院应当在审判程序中突出指导性案例及其法理;法官个人应当在掌握法理的基础上积极适用指导性案例。法理的实践效果借助于指导性案例而得以彰显,体现了司法改革在制度和理念上的进步。
In judicial practice,although the concept of Fali has not yet formed a general consensus on its exact connotation,its extension scope generally includes legal principles,policy and theory,which can function as secondary legal resources and argumentative reasons.The guiding cases promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court ( SPC) contain abundant Fali.There are some reasons why guiding cases are making full use of Fali:the Fali can solve the difficulties in guiding cases as hard cases;Fali is authoritative argumentative reason for guiding cases;guiding cases can show the Fali with Chinese characters;certain Fali can be well explained in guiding cases.To further enhance the positive effect of Fali in guiding cases,the SPC should substantially increase the number of guiding cases and specially highlight the role of Fali in the reasons for adjudication;the local courts should highlight guiding cases and their Fali in trial procedures;and judges should actively apply guiding cases on the basis of mastering Fali.The actual effect of Fali can be demonstrated by guiding cases,which reflects the progress of judicial reform in institutions and ideas.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期19-32,共14页
Law and Social Development
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目"案例指导制度的实践经验与发展完善研究"(18BFX056)的阶段性成果
关键词
指导性案例
法理
法律原则
刑事政策
诚信原则
正当程序
Guiding Cases
Fali
Legal Principle
Criminal Policy
Good Faith Principle
Due Process
