期刊文献+

现代学徒制利益相关者治理:从“碎片化”到“整体性”——基于整体性治理视角 被引量:9

Modern Apprenticeship Stakeholder Governance:from "Fragmentation" to "Wholeness"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 整体性治理理论是新公共管理危机后,针对碎片化困境提出来的最新理论和实践成果,其关键内核在于形成各治理主体整合、协调、合作的治理框架。当前我国现代学徒制利益相关者在治理过程中,存在着严重的"碎片化"困境,具体表现为治理主体利益多元分化和二元分化,这种利益分化又导致治理总体目标异化和长远目标、短期目标断层化,同时,治理运行过程和保障制度也呈现出碎片化特质。整体性治理理论可对消除我国现代学徒制利益相关者治理"碎片化"困境提供借鉴,即通过整合协调治理目标,整合多元利益治理主体,整合跨界运行过程,整合制度约束各方,并利用信息技术手段协调各方,促使我国现代学徒制利益相关者治理得以"善治"。从逻辑关系分析,其治理之道是由"碎片化"迈向"整体性"。 The theory of holistic governance is the latest theory and practice after the new public management crisis,and its key core lies in the formation of the governance framework of integration,coordination and cooperation. At present,there is a serious 'fragmentation' dilemma in the process of the governance of modern apprenticeship stakeholders in China,which is embodied in the multiple differentiation of governance subjects ’interests and the differentiation of duality,which leads to the alienation of governance overall goal and the short term target,and the process of governance and the fragmentation of the safeguards system also present a fragmented character. The theory of holistic governance can provide reference for the 'fragmentation' of Chinese modern apprenticeship stakeholders’ management. Through the integration of coordinated governance objectives,the integration of multiple interests governance subjects,the integration of cross-border operation process,the integration of the system to restrain all parties,and the use of information technology mean to coordinate all parties,and to promote the modern apprenticeship of our country’s stakeholders to govern good governance. From the analysis of logic relationship,the way of governance is from 'fragmentation' to 'wholeness'.
机构地区 华中师范大学
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期103-107,共5页 Modern Education Management
基金 中央高校基本科研管理科学类课题"华中师范大学教师培训质量提升策略研究"(CCNU17ZY0031)
关键词 现代学徒制 利益相关者 整体性治理视角 modern apprenticeship stakeholders overall governance perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献75

  • 1赵琳,冯蔚星.中国职业教育兴衰的制度主义分析——“市场化”制度变迁的考察[J].清华大学教育研究,2003,24(6):41-46. 被引量:23
  • 2Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量:253
  • 3李宝元.人力资本论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009:20-131. 被引量:7
  • 4刘泽云,萧今.教育投资收益分析-基于多层模型方法的研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009. 被引量:4
  • 5Siegel Donald, Waldman David, Atwater Lea- nne.Commercial Knowladge Transfers from Universiti- es to Firms:Improving the Effectiveness of Universit- Industry Collaboration [J].Journal of Higher Technol- ogy Management Research, 2003, ( 1 ) : 111-134. 被引量:1
  • 6Pert'i, ET al. Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda [M]. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 7Perri 6, Diana Lear, Kinbery Sel- ter, and Gerry Stoker. Towards Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. New York: Palgrave, 2002. pp.35,37 - 39,179,78 - 81,47 - 48, 46. 被引量:1
  • 8Perri 6. Holistic Government. London: Demos, 1997. pp.26 - 37. 被引量:1
  • 9Tom Ling. Delivering Joined-up Government in the UK: Dimensions, Issues and Problems. Public Administration, 2002 (4). p.630. 被引量:1
  • 10T Tom Christensen, Per L?greid. The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review, 2007, (11). 被引量:1

共引文献200

同被引文献86

引证文献9

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部