期刊文献+

“自然人”与“技术人”:对基因编辑婴儿事件的伦理审视 被引量:7

“Natural Person” and “Technological Person”:An Ethical Review on Gene-editing Baby Events
原文传递
导出
摘要 对基因编辑婴儿事件进行伦理评析,并结合目前文献中常见的反对胚胎基因编辑的伦理依据可知,一旦解决了胚胎基因编辑的安全性问题,完全禁止胚胎基因编辑的临床应用就不再具有合理性。胚胎基因编辑技术对于遗传性疾病的预防和人类遗传素质的改善具有重要价值,这些价值构成了对胚胎基因编辑临床应用的伦理学辩护。此外,有两条道义论论据也能为此提供辩护:人类对幸福的追求为应用技术提供了有理支持;只要对社会和他人不会造成伤害,人有追求自己认可价值的自由。 Based on the ethical analysis of'gene editing baby event'and the common ethical basis against embryo gene editing in current literature,it can be seen that once the safety problem of embryo gene editing is solved,it is no longer reasonable to completely ban the clinical application of embryo gene editing.Embryo gene editing technology is of great value for the prevention of genetic diseases and the improvement of human genetic quality.In addition,two deontological arguments can be used to justify these:1)the human pursuit of happiness justifies the application of technology;2)as long as it does not harm society or others,people have the freedom to pursue their own recognized values.
作者 王云岭 WANG Yunling;School of Basic Medicine,Shandong University(School of Basic Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China)
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第2期36-41,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 贺建奎 基因编辑婴儿 胚胎基因编辑 CRISPR/Cas9 基因治疗 HE Jian-kui gene-editing baby embryo gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献38

  • 1樊浩.基因技术的道德哲学革命[J].中国社会科学,2006(1):123-134. 被引量:62
  • 2Cyranoski D, Reardon S. Embryo editing sparks epic debate[EB/ OL]. (2015 04--29)[2015 11--24].http://www. nature, com/ news/embryo-editing sparks epic debate 1. 17421. 被引量:1
  • 3Macklin R. Altering Genetic Material:A Line that Must Not Be Crossed, The Doctor's Table blog, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University[EB/OL]. (2015--04--30) [2015 11--24]. http://blogs. einstein, yu. edu/altering genetic-material-a-line-that must-not-be-crossed. 被引量:1
  • 4Cyranoski D. Chinese Scientists Genetically Modify Human Embryos, Scientific American [EB/OL]. (2015 -- 04 30) [2015-11-24]. http://www, scientific.american, con~/article/ehinesescientists-genmically modify human-embryos. 被引量:1
  • 5Tebas P,Stein D,Tang W W,et al. Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous (;194 T cells of persons infected with HIV[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014,370 (10):901--910. 被引量:1
  • 6Sharma R,Anguela X M,Doyon Y,et al. In vivo genome editing of the albumin locus as a platform for protein replacement therapy[J]. Blood, 2015,126(15):1777- 1784. 被引量:1
  • 7Reardon S. Leukaemia success heralds wave of gene-editing therapies [EB/OL]. (2015 11--05)[2015 11--24]. http://www, nature. com/news/leukaemia success-heralds wave-of-gene-editing therapies- 1. 18737. 被引量:1
  • 8Connor S. Exclusive="Jaw dropping" Breakthrough Hailed as Landmark in Fight against Hereditary Diseases as Crispr Technique Heralds Genetic Revolution. The Independent[EB/OL]. (2013--11--08)[2015-11-24].http=//www, independent, co. uk/news/science/exelusive-jawdropping- breakthrough-hailed-asqandmark-in-fight against hereditary diseases-as crispr-techniquc~hera|ds genetic-revolution-8925295, html. 被引量:1
  • 9Billings P R, Hubbard R,Newman S A. Hum,~m germline gene modification:a dissent[J]. Lancet, 1999,353(9167) : 1873-1875. 被引量:1
  • 10Cooper A R, Jungheim E S. Preimplantation genetic testing= indications and controversies[J]. Clin Lab Med,2010,30(3):519 -531. 被引量:1

共引文献225

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部