期刊文献+

法律语篇中情态动词的权力剖析

Power Analysis of Modality in Legal Discourse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法律语篇是一种非常正式的书面语,其一个重要特征是规定应当承担的法律责任和义务,这种权力的体现手段之一就是情态词汇的准确运用。法律语篇不同于普通语篇,它对情态动词的选择和运用有着严格的要求。本论文就Palmer的研究模式对法律语篇中不同情态动词的细微情态意义进行分析,从批评语言学的角度解释其中蕴含的权力,企图探讨情态动词的运用和法律语言权力体现之间的内在联系,充实现有的国内法律语言研究。 Legal discourse is very formal and its main function is to stipulate legal duty and obligation parties are required to undertake. This power can be realized by the correct usage of modality in the legal discourse. Legal discourse quite differs from common discourses, which holds strict requirements for the choice and usage of modal words. This paper analyzes triple modal meanings of different modal verbs in legal discourse. Power inherited in it is explained and explored in terms of the relationship between modality and power realization in legal language. The result of the study also helps law drafters know clearer about legal language.
作者 马丽娅
机构地区 长治学院外语系
出处 《长治学院学报》 2015年第1期79-82,共4页 Journal of Changzhi University
关键词 法律语篇 情态 权力 legal discourse modality power
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

  • 1辛斌.语言、权力与意识形态:批评语言学[J].现代外语,1996,19(1):21-26. 被引量:232
  • 2唐青叶,李东阳.汉英语气系统对比分析与翻译[J].上海翻译,2007(3):69-73. 被引量:16
  • 3罗素.权力论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998.. 被引量:7
  • 4范文芳.语言的人际功能与命题形式[J].外语研究,2007,24(4):31-35. 被引量:13
  • 5Barton, E. Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance [J].College English,1993(55):745-69. 被引量:1
  • 6Besnier, N. Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll [ A ]. in J.H. Hill and J. T. Irvine ( eds. ) Repsonsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1993. 被引量:1
  • 7Biber, D. and E. Finegan. Style of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect [J]. Text, 1989(11) :93-124. 被引量:1
  • 8Chafe, W. L. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing [A]. In W. L. Chafe, and J. Nichols (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [C]. Norwool, NJ: Ablex, 1986. 被引量:1
  • 9Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. Adverbial marking stance in speech and writing [A]. In Susan Huston and Geoff Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text : Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2000:.56- 73. 被引量:1
  • 10Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language [M]. London: Longman. 1995. 被引量:1

共引文献269

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部