摘要
既往研究多从亲社会行为者角度回答什么情况下人们做好事却得不到好名声的问题。基于双加工过程理论,采用三个实验考察亲社会动机与受助者获益对亲社会名声的影响及思维方式在其中的作用。结果表明:(1)判断行为动机时,人们认为纯粹利他动机的行为者做出亲社会行为的动机利他性最高;(2)在助人行为情境中,当行为者动机和行为结果产生冲突时,人们在给予行为者亲社会名声时会综合考虑行为者的动机及受助者获益情况;(3)相较于具有直觉思维方式的人,具有理性思维方式的人在评价亲社会行为者时对其动机更加敏感。
Previous research has primarily focused on the perspective of prosocial actors to address the question of why people perform good deeds without receiving a corresponding good reputation.Drawing from the dual process theory of moral judgment,this study employs three experiments to investigate the impact of prosocial motivation and recipient benefits on prosocial reputation,as well as the role of thinking styles in this process.First,the findings reveal that individuals perceive those with purely altruistic motives as exhibiting the highest level of altruism in their prosocial behavior.Additionally,in helping situations where an actor's motivation and the outcome of their behavior conflict,people take into account both the actor's intentions and the recipient's benefit when evaluating prosocial reputation.Finally,it is found that individuals with an analytical thinking style are more attuned to the motivations of prosocial actors compared to those with an intuitive thinking style.
作者
朱栓蔚
林苹
路红
ZHU Shuanwei;LIN Ping;LU Hong(Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences,School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China;Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510521,China)
出处
《心理技术与应用》
2024年第11期641-654,667,共15页
Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金
广州市教育科学规划2021年度重点课题(202113603)。
