摘要
将信用惩戒措施纳入知识产权侵权治理体系并逐步实现法治化,系中国全面加强知识产权法治保障、推动知识产权强国建设的重要举措。在中国全面提高知识产权保护水平和推动建设知识产权强国的大背景下,梳理有关制度的发展沿革并分析其发展态势,对在把握其正确的发展方向下寻找对应之策大有裨益。基于有关文件的内容相关性与效力层级,梳理出中国知识产权侵权主体信用惩戒制度发展历程的3个阶段,认为中国针对知识产权侵权主体的信用惩戒制度仍缺乏系统性的整合与严格的法律论证。从法治的视角上看,知识产权侵权主体信用惩戒制度的构造必须遵循依法惩戒、协同共治、过惩得当与权益保护等基本原则。然而,中国现行相关规定难以落地实施,存在缺乏明确的法律依据、惩戒对象与标准不明、惩戒监督与救济不足等诸多问题。鉴于此,有关部门应当遵循依法惩戒等法治原则,从健全相关法律规范体系、构造惩戒“对象-标准-手段”的合理规则和完善知识产权信用惩戒监管与救济机制等方面优化中国知识产权侵权主体信用惩戒制度。
Integrating credit punishment measures into the governance of intellectual property infringement and gradually establishing the rule of law is a crucial step for China in strengthening legal protection of intellectual property rights and advancing its development as a leading intellectual property power.In the context of China's overall improvement of the intellectual property protection and building an leading intellectual property power,it is highly beneficial to examine the development history of the relevant systems,analyze their trends,and identify appropriate measures by understanding the correct development direction.In 2008,Shenzhen took the lead in including the infringement facts of infringers into the integrity records of intellectual property rights,and linked the integrity records of intellectual property rights to the credit information system,intensifying the crackdown on intellectual property infringement."Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System(2014-2020)"promulgated by the State Council of the People's Republic of China in June 2014 regards the construction of the credit system in the field of intellectual property.It officially marks the initial stage of the credit punishment system in the field of intellectual property.Based on the content relevance and effectiveness level of relevant documents,this paper sorts out three stages of the development process of China's credit punishment system for intellectual property infringing subjects,and believes that China's credit punishment system for intellectual property infringing subjects still lacks systematic integration and strict legal argumentation.From the perspective of the rule of law,the construction of the credit punishment system for the subject of intellectual property infringement must follow the basic principles of punishment according to law, cooperative governance, appropriate excessive punishment and rights protection. However, China'scurrent relevant provisions are difficult to implement. There are many problem
作者
王影航
黄勤勤
李炳超
李金惠
Wang Yinghang;Huang Qinqin;Li Bingchao;Li Jinhui(School of Law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China;Guangdong Association of Science of Science and S&T Management Research,Guangzhou 510033,China;Guangdong R&D Center for Technological Economy,Guangzhou 510070,China)
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
2024年第17期230-238,共9页
Science and Technology Management Research
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金重大专项项目“社会主义核心价值观融入网络治理法治化研究”(19VHJ005)
广东省软科学研究计划项目“《广东省科技创新条例》制定及实施研究”(2024A1010070004)
广东省哲学社会科学规划习近平法治思想研究专项项目“全球共治视野下人工智能生成内容知识产权保护问题研究”(GD24XFZ07)。
关键词
知识产权
侵权
信用惩戒
比例原则
法律治理
intellectual property rights
infringement
credit punishment
the principle of proportionality
legal governance
