摘要
知识产权信用治理是我国社会信用体系建设的重要组成部分,而对知识产权失信行为予以行政惩戒则构成失信约束的核心机制。当前,有关知识产权失信行政惩戒的制度探索和实践虽已在国家和地方层面展开,但作为一种新型的信用治理工具,知识产权失信行政惩戒的规范性问题仍较为突出。为保护知识产权领域信用主体的合法权益,引导行政惩戒在法治框架内有序实施,对知识产权失信行政惩戒的法律规范应当注意三方面的问题:首先,知识产权违法与知识产权失信并不等同,对知识产权失信行为的界定应谨防因扩张过度而不合理地挤压行为主体的“试错空间”;其次,当下对知识产权失信行政惩戒措施的设定与法治国的要求还有相当大的差距,需根据比例、关联、合法三原则在立法上及时做出调整;最后,知识产权失信行政惩戒的规范性也应通过优化程序制度设计获得体现,鉴于失信信息的认定与失信修复分别为启动和提前终止行政惩戒的两个重要环节,应当注重二者在规范失信行政惩戒活动中的程序控制意义。
The credit governance of intellectual property rights is an integral part of China's social credit system construction,and administrative punishment for dishonest acts of intellectual property is the core mechanism of dishonest constraint.At present,although the exploration and implementation of administrative punishment for dishonesty of intellectual property have been carried out at the national and local levels as a new tool for credit governance,the normative issues of administrative punishment for dishonesty of intellectual property remain prominent.In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of credit subjects in the field of intellectual property,and to guide the orderly implementation of administrative punishment measures within the framework of the rule of law,three issues should be paid attention to in the legal norms for administrative punishment of intellectual property dishonesty:Firstly,in the definition of intellectual property dishonesty,it is necessary to guard against unreasonably squeezing the“trial-and-error-space” of credit subjects due to excessive expansion;Secondly,there is still a considerable gap between the current administrative punishment measures for intellectual property dishonesty and the requirements of the rule of law,and it needs to be adjusted in a timely manner in legislation based on the three principles of proportionality,relevance and legality;Finally,the normativity of administrative sanctions for intellectual property dishonesty should also be reflected by optimizing the design of the procedural system,in view of the fact that the identification of dishonest information and the restoration of dishonest information are two pivotal stages for the initiation and early termination of administrative punishment,emphasis should be placed on the procedural control significance within normative framework of the two in regulating the administrative punishment for dishonesty.
作者
邓辉
胡弓卿正
Deng Hui;Hu Gongqingzheng
出处
《江西社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第12期123-133,208,共12页
Jiangxi Social Sciences
