摘要
信用惩戒制度是近年的研究热点,但对知识产权领域信用惩戒的研究才刚起步,西方国家信用惩戒主要应用于信贷、就业、商业交易、获得资格或其他利好事项上,一般是从两个路径对知识产权领域失信行为进行规范,一是法律路径;二是道德、舆论、市场、宗教等社会性路径,也即非法律路径。这和我国主要以行政和司法这两股力量为主导自上而下推动知识产权领域信用体系建设的路径迥然不同,我国在充分吸取域外经验的基础上,有必要取长补短,从社会信用法和知识产权法这两重框架内进行立法上的完善。
The punishment on dishonesty has been a hot spot in recent years,but the research on the punishment on dishonesty in the field of intellectual property has just started.The punishment on dishonesty in western countries is mainly used in credit,employment,business transactions,obtaining qualifications or other favorable matters.In general,there are two paths to regulate dishonest behavior in the field of intellectual property rights.One is the legal path,the other is the social path of morality,public opinion,market,religion,etc.,that is the non-legal path.This is completely different from the top-down approach of promoting the establishment of credit system in the field of intellectual property in China,which is mainly led by administrative and judicial forces.On the basis of fully absorbing extraterritorial experience,it is necessary for our country to learn from their strengths the consummation of legislation should becarried out within the dual frameworks of the law of social credit and intellectual property.
作者
柯林霞
张毅
Ke Linxia;Zhang Yi
出处
《电子知识产权》
CSSCI
2020年第8期31-44,共14页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
江苏省2020年高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“知识产权领域信用惩戒制度研究”。
关键词
知识产权
信用惩戒
立法
Intellectual Property
the Punishment on Dishonesty
Legislation
