期刊文献+

对苏格拉底德性是否可教的误读与澄清

Misreading and Clarification of Whether Socrates’Virtue is Teachable
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有不少学者提出苏格拉底的德性可教命题充满悖论,理由是苏格拉底反对从实践(σκητν)获得德性。然而从σκητν的古希腊文原义出发,σκητν所指的并不是“实践”而是“训练”,那么学者们基于“实践”推导出的结论就不可靠。基于苏格拉底的哲学立场可知,他的结论实际是:真正知识的德性可教,非知识的德性不可教。且结合柏拉图的诸多早中期对话,发现苏格拉底不但没有否认通过实践可以获得德性,而且认可通过训练可以获得德性。苏格拉底的德性教育不只是一种启发式教育,更是引导学生进行理性“训练”的过程。对σκητν的词义追溯和文本分析可知,《美诺》中的德性可教并非矛盾,由此澄清了苏格拉底对理性训练的重视和对实践的真实态度,回归到苏格拉底德性可教的本意。 Many scholars have proposed that Socrates’proposition that virtue can be taught is full of paradoxes.The reason is that Socrates opposed obtaining virtue from practice(σκητν).However,starting from the original meaning ofσκητνin ancient Greece,whatσκητνrefers to is not“practice”but“training”,so the conclusions deduced by scholars based on“practice”are not reliable.From the philosophical standpoint of Socrates,his conclusion is that the virtue of true knowledge can be taught,and the virtue of non-knowledge cannot be taught.Combined with Plato’s early and middle dialogues,it is found that Socrates did not oppose that virtue can be obtained through practice,while recognizes that virtue can be obtained through training.Socrates’virtue education is not only a heuristic teaching,but also a process of guiding students to carry out rational“training”.It explains that the virtue teachable in Meno is not a contradiction by checking back the meaning ofσκητνand analyzing the text.It clarifies Socrates’emphasis on rational training and his true attitude towards practice,and returns to Socrates’original intention that virtue can be taught.
作者 倪艳 NI Yan(Anhui Polytechnic University,Wuhu Anhui 241000,China;Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第4期14-26,共13页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 安徽高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“高校‘三全育人’理念下隐性教育路径研究”(SK2019A0274) 国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国古代个体道德生成机制对新时代公民道德建设的启示研究”(20BZX119)。
关键词 苏格拉底 德性可教 实践 训练 Socrates virtue can be taught practice train
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献26

  • 1布鲁士.罗素.立足于实用主义而非怀疑主义的关联主义[J].河北学刊,2004,24(6):56-62. 被引量:1
  • 2[古希腊]色诺芬.回忆苏格拉底[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984. 被引量:29
  • 3Audi, Robert, 1988, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge, Wadsworth. 被引量:1
  • 4Gettier, Edmund, 1963, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?" Analysis 23. 被引量:1
  • 5Goldman, Alvin, 1967, "A Causal Theory of Knowledge", Journal of Philosophy 64. 1976, "Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge", Journal of Philosophy 73. 被引量:1
  • 6Harman, Gilbert, 1968, "Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation", American Philosophical Quarterly 5. 1973, Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1981, "Reasoning and Evidence One does not Possess", Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 5. 被引量:1
  • 7Lehrer, Keith, 2000, Theory of Knowledge, Colorado: Westview Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Lehrer, Keith, and Thomas D. Paxson, Jr. , 1969, "Knowledge : Undefeated Justified True Belief", Journal of Philosophy 66. 被引量:1
  • 9Plantinga, Alvin, 1993, Warrant: The Current Debate, New York: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Pollock, John L. , 1956, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部