期刊文献+

基于层次分析法的课堂教学质量评价体系研究——以概率论与数理统计课程为例

Research of Classroom Teaching Quality Evaluation System based on Analytic Hierarchy Process——Taking Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课堂教学质量评价体系作为整个教学过程中的关键环节具有重要的地位,传统的课堂教学质量评价模式单一、评价标准固定,在一定程度上很难反映当前课堂教学效果。基于此,文章以概率论与数理统计课程为例,从学生的视角出发,提出了准则层和指标层的影响因素,构建课堂教学质量评价指标体系,并利用层次分析法研究各影响因素的权重系数。实例分析进一步验证了模型的可行性、科学性,为课堂教学质量评价研究提供了新方法。 The evaluation system of classroom teaching quality is an important link in the entire teaching process and also occupies an important position.The traditional classroom teaching quality evaluation model is single and the evaluation standard is fixed,which is difficult to reflect the current classroom teaching effect to a certain extent.Based on the above questions,taking the course of probability and statistics as an example,the article proposes the influencing factors of criterion layer and index layer to construct the evaluation index system of classroom teaching quality from the perspective of students.The analytic hierarchy process is used to study the weight coefficient of each influencing factor.The case analysis further verifies the feasibility and scientificity of the model,and provides a new method for the evaluation of classroom teaching quality.
作者 曹淑霞 董翠玲 牛军强 CAO Shu-xia;DONG Cui-ling;NIU Jun-qiang(College of Mathematical Sciences,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi,Xinjing,830017,China;College of Geographic Science and Tourism,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi,Xinjiang,830054,China)
出处 《新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 2024年第4期75-82,共8页 Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Natural Sciences Edition)
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2023D01A037) 新疆师范大学优秀青年教师科研启动基金项目(XJNU202116)。
关键词 概率论与数理统计 层次分析法 学生视角 教学质量评价体系 Probability theory and mathematical statistics Analytic hierarchy process Students′perspective Teaching quality evaluation system
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献71

  • 1骆兰,薛艳,唐国强.论高校课堂教学质量评估指标体系的构建[J].高教探索,2006(6):55-56. 被引量:39
  • 2赵晓娟 张德生 李文静.加权马氏距离判别法在课堂教学评估中的应用.长江大学学报自然科学版,2009,3(6):136-137. 被引量:3
  • 3许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津大学出版社,1988.. 被引量:187
  • 4PROSSER M,TRIGWELL K. Understanding Learning and Teaching:the Experience in Higher Education[M].London:McGraw Hill Education,1999. 被引量:1
  • 5LONG M. The course experience questionnaire and Australian universities[J].Unicorn,1995,(21):27-35. 被引量:1
  • 6POLLITT C. Measuring university performance:never mind the quality,never mind the width[J].{H}HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY,1990,(44):61-81. 被引量:1
  • 7MARSH H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:research findings,methodological issues,and directions for future research[J].{H}INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH,1987,(11):253-388. 被引量:1
  • 8ROMAINVILLE M. Quality evaluation of teaching in higher education[J].Higher Education in Europe,1999,(24):415-424. 被引量:1
  • 9RAMSDEN P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education:The Course Experience Questionnaire[J].{H}STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION,1991,(16):129-150. 被引量:1
  • 10WACHTEL H. Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness:a brief review[J].Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,1998,(23):191-211. 被引量:1

共引文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部