摘要
现代国际投资争端解决机制的结构体系,始终伴随着东道国、投资母国和投资者这三方关系在“公”“私”两个维度上的互动而发生着变化,构成一个“三方二维”结构。在国际投资争端解决机制中,国家究竟是将争端解决的权利向外让渡还是收回,国际投资争端解决机制构建的重心是向国家远离还是回归,卡尔沃主义从诞生、发展、沉寂到复兴的过程给出了答案。随着卡尔沃主义的复兴,世界主要国家和地区采取积极的应对模式与改革措施,对原有的国际投资仲裁机制进行修正并向国家回归。坚持和维护国家主权的利益将构成未来一段时期国际投资争端解决机制变革的重要主题。
The structure of the modern international investment dispute settlement(IIDS)mechanism is always changing with the interaction of the tripartite relationship among the host country,the home country and the investor in the“public”and“private”dimensions,forming a“three-way two-dimensional”structure.The process of birth,development,demise and resurrection of the Calvo Doctrine provides implications for whether the state will cede or withdraw its dispute settlement rights in the IIDS mechanism,and whether the gravity of the IIDS mechanism moves away from or return to the state.With the resurrection of the Calvo Doctrine,major states and regions have taken active responses and measures to amend the international investment arbitration mechanism and have it return to the state.Safeguarding the interests of state sovereignty will constitute an important theme for the change of the IIDS mechanism in the coming period.
出处
《地方立法研究》
CSSCI
2024年第2期31-49,共19页
Local Legislation Journal
基金
北京市社会科学基金决策咨询重点项目“北京国际争议解决中心建设研究”(20JCB058)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
卡尔沃主义
国际投资争端解决
外交保护
用尽当地救济
the Calvo Doctrine
international investment dispute settlement(IIDS)
diplomatic protection
exhaustion of local remedies
