摘要
推动哲学社会科学学科建设以中国自主知识体系建构为根本目标,科学地组织开展哲学社会科学学科建设成效评价是实现这一目标的重要抓手和逻辑必然。研究构建“自主建构—成效评价”高度耦合联动的模型框架,旨在推动自主知识体系建构更好地为哲学社会科学学科建设成效评价提供世界观和方法论指导,更加充分发挥学科建设成效评价的指挥棒和风向标作用,促进哲学社会科学学科的知识创新、理论创新、方法创新,进而全面助力自主知识体系建构。基于该框架,哲学社会科学学科建设成效评价应充分遵循学科发展的基本规律和政策要求,破解哲学社会科学学科评价顽疾,并以把握思想方向与中国范式、关注过程建设与发展潜力、重视内涵发展与实质创新、适用多元标准与专业方法为运作锚点,确保评价活动服务自主知识体系建构。其实践重点包括考察哲学社会科学学科育人机制及其成效、评估教师梯队合理性与人才引育机制、完善以代表作评价为核心的科研评议机制、实施“案例式”社会影响评价、生成“自主建构—成效评价”的诊断式闭环报告。
The fundamental goal of promoting philosophy and social sciences discipline construction is to construct China's independent knowledge system,and the scientific effectiveness evaluation of philosophy and social sciences discipline construction is an important means and a logical necessity to achieve this goal.The highly coupled and interrelated analytical framework of“independent construction-effectiveness evaluation”aims to promote the construction of independent knowledge system to better provide worldview and methodological guidance for the effectiveness evaluation,give fuller play to the role of the baton and weathervane of effectiveness evaluation,and promote the knowledge innovation,theoretical innovation and methodological innovation of philosophy and social science disciplines.Based on this analytical framework,the effectiveness evaluation should fully follow the development law of Chinese philosophy and social sciences,meet discipline development policies,overcome the core dilemma of the current evaluation of philosophy and social sciences,and be guided by maintaining the political orientation and Chinese paradigm,paying attention to the construction process and development potential,emphasizing on the connotative development and the substantive innovation,and applying diversified standards and professional methodology,to ensure that evaluation activities can serve the construction of independent knowledge system.The focus of practice includes examining the mechanism for educating people in philosophy and social sciences and its effectiveness,assessing the rationality of the faculty echelon and the mechanism for attracting and nurturing talents,perfecting the mechanism for scientific research evaluation centered on the evaluation of masterpieces,implementing the“case-based”evaluation of social influence,and generating the“independent construction-effectiveness evaluation”diagnostic closed-loop evaluation report.
作者
张栋梁
邱滨泽
夏文莉
ZHANG Dongliang;QIU Binze;XIA Wenli(CollegeofEducation,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Institute of China's Science,Technology and Education Policy,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Innovation Center of Yangtze River Delta,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)
出处
《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期181-191,共11页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目“新时代一流大学建设成效评价理论与应用研究”(72074029),项目负责人:林梦泉(子课题负责人:夏文莉)。
关键词
中国自主知识体系
哲学社会科学
“双一流”建设
学科建设
成效评价
China's independent knowledge system
philosophy and social sciences
“Double First-Class”construction
discipline construction
effectiveness evaluation
