摘要
数据是伴随人类劳动方式的改变而发生更替的。数据存在的形式分为物质形式、能量形式与信息形式,这三种形式分别与劳动方式对应。在古代,劳动方式以客观存在物为劳动对象,进而探索到物质形式中的数据性存在;在近代,劳动方式以能量作为劳动对象,进而探索到能量形式中的数据性存在;在当代,劳动方式以信息作为劳动对象,从而把握信息存在中的数据性。数据在移动互联网广泛应用的当下转化为大数据,极大地推进了生产方式的变革。故而,深度挖掘与分析大数据与劳动结构的内在关联,关涉到夯实数据化劳动方式的哲学理论根基。大数据与劳动结构关联的本质乃是主体与客体的对立统一,是劳动者与大数据之间的关系问题。劳动者作为这一矛盾关联体的“极点”具有绝对主体的位置,其自身同大数据作为绝对客体的位置相同,都是不可变动的实体。因此,这对矛盾就是主客体的割裂与统一。大数据与劳动结构具有内在关联,并从而生发出主客体的矛盾。这种分析过程有何意义?主客体之间的矛盾又该如何消解?对第一个问题的回答为:分析过程的意义是通过大数据与劳动结构的关联来证实马克思主义哲学的合理性基础,为数据化时代作出理论剖析。对第二个问题的回答为:主客体的矛盾通过人类的实践来弥合,以劳动者自身的知识促成主体与客体的统一,形成“美的灵魂”。
Data has undergone a change in the way it accompanies human labor.Data exists in the forms of material,energy,and information,which correspond to labor modes.In ancient times,the mode of labor took the objective existence as the subject,and thus the data-based existence in the material form was explored.In modern times,the mode of labor took energy as the subject,and thus the data-based existence in the energy form was explored.In contemporary times,the mode of labor regards informatization as its object,thus grasping the data-driven nature of information existence.Data has been transformed into big data in the current era of widespread mobile Internet application,which has greatly promoted the transformation of production modes.Therefore,deep mining and analysis of the inherent relationship between big data and labor structure is related to consolidating the philosophical theoretical foundation of data-based labor modes.The essence of the relationship between big data and labor structure is the unity of opposites between the subject and the object,and the relationship between workers and big data.As the“pole”of this contradiction association,workers have the position of absolute subject,which is the same as the position of big data as absolute object,both of which are immovable entities.Therefore,this contradiction is the separation and unity of the subject and object.Big data and labor structure have an inherent relationship,which gives rise to the contradiction between subject and object.What is the significance of this analysis process?How can the contradiction be resolved?Firstly,the significance of analysis is to confirm the rational basis of Marxist philosophy and make a theoretical analysis for the data era through the connection between big data and labor structure.Secondly,the contradiction between subject and object is bridged through human practice,and the unity of subject and object is promoted by the knowledge of the laborer itself,forming a“beautiful soul”.
作者
高剑平
魏一帆
GAO Jianping;WEI Yifan(School of Politics and Public Management,Guangxi Minzu University,Nanning 530006,China)
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第1期102-111,共10页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金重大项目:中国特色社会主义道路、理论、制度、文化的科学内涵和内在关系研究(21&ZD013)子课题三:中国特色社会主义制度研究
广西民族大学研究生教育创新计划项目(GXUN-CHXS2022001)
广西研究生教育创新计划项目(JGY2021072)。
关键词
数据
大数据
劳动结构
实践
data
big data
labor structure
practice
