期刊文献+

晶体硅和钙钛矿光伏组件碳足迹研究 被引量:1

STUDY ON CARBON FOOTPRINT OF CRYSTALLINE SILICON AND PEROVSKITE PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球的光伏技术及其市场在清洁能源运用的不断增进下呈现快速发展趋势。为评估光伏组件在生产和制造环节对环境的影响,利用GaBi软件以及生命周期评估(LCA)的方法进行研究和评估,主要评估对象包含晶体硅光伏组件,这些组件采用不同电池,包括发射极背钝化(PERC)太阳电池、隧穿氧化层钝化接触(TOPCon)太阳电池和异质结(HJT)太阳电池,以及新型钙钛矿太阳电池(PSCs)。计算发现现有4种光伏组件的典型碳足迹分别为469.25、474.24、427.98和500.55 kg CO_(2)/kW。对于晶体硅太阳电池,硅片生产所引起的碳足迹份额最大,占比达到50%以上。对于钙钛矿太阳电池,其光伏组件由于现阶段产业化效率较低,碳足迹较大。 Photovoltaic technologies have shown a rapid been develop ment trend due to promote global clean energy applications.To evaluate the environment impact of solar cell during procluction and manufacturing process,crystalline silicon solar cell industry technology including passivated emitter and rear cell(PERC),tunnel oxide passivated contact(TOPCon)solar cell and heterojunction(HJT)solar cell,and also the emerging perovskite solar cell(PSCs),were estimated with the GaBi software and the life cycle assessment(LCA)approach.As the calculation results,typical carbon footprints of the four types of photovoltaic modules are 469.25,474.24,427.98 and 500.55 kg CO_(2)/kW respectively.For crystalline silicon photovoltaic module,the carbon footprint caused by silicon wafer production is more than 50%.Currently PSCs module has a largecarbon footprint due to its low inclustriul:zation efficiency.
作者 庄园 温金城 卞与良 茅笑笑 李马杰 叶晓军 Zhuang Yuan;Wen Jincheng;Bian Yuliang;Mao Xiaoxiao;Li Majie;Ye Xiaojun(School of Materials Science and Engineering,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China;Department of Materials Science,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《太阳能学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2023年第12期41-46,共6页 Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica
基金 沪农科推字(2021)第3-4号。
关键词 碳足迹 光伏组件 晶体硅 钙钛矿 生命周期 carbon footprint photovoltaic modules crystalline silicon perovskite life cycle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1顾道金,朱颖心,谷立静.中国建筑环境影响的生命周期评价[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(12):1953-1956. 被引量:76
  • 2俞海勇,庄智.民用建筑碳排放计算方法研究[R].上海:上海市建筑科学研究院(集团)有限公司,2011. 被引量:1
  • 3Ignacio Zabalza Bribi6n, Antonio Valero Capilla, Alfonso Aranda Us6n. Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eeo-effieiency improvement potential [ J ]. Building and Environment,2011,46 : 1133-1140. 被引量:1
  • 4Rosa M. Cu611ar-Franca, Adisa Azapagic. Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses [ J ]. Building and Environment,2012,54 : 86-89. 被引量:1
  • 5Paula Quinteiro, Ant6nio Arajo, Brnna Oliveira, et al. The carbon footprint and energy consumption of a commercially produced earthenware ceramic piece[ J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 2012,32:2087-2094. 被引量:1
  • 6中国建材工业协会.中国建筑材料工业年鉴2012[M].北京:中国建筑材料工业年鉴社,201. 被引量:1
  • 7国家统计局能源统计司.中国能源年鉴2012[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013. 被引量:1
  • 8Wang M Q. GREET 1. 5-Transportation fuel-cycle model, vol. 1: methodology, development, use, and results[M]. Argonne: Argonne National Laboratory, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 9王婧,张旭.基于生命周期的能源上游清单分析模型改进[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(4):520-524. 被引量:10
  • 10李蔓,王震,孙德智.聚乙烯生产生命周期评价的研究[J].环境科学与技术,2009,32(5):191-195. 被引量:31

共引文献15

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部