摘要
本研究通过对比政府主导型、市场主导型和村集体经济组织主导型社会化服务模式,讨论了小农户如何被组织起来以及组织成本由谁承担的问题。在由政府主导的社会化服务模式中,小农户因受到政府补贴的吸引而达成了临时的合作,但这种组织化具有暂时性。在市场主导型社会化服务模式中,小农户或被整合到规模经营主体的种植模式中,或被服务组织重塑。在这两种服务模式中,小农户都是被动的参与者,其组织化程度并未提高。村集体经济组织可能通过重建与小农户的双向权责均衡关系,通过收取服务费用的方式来解决组织成本问题。这种双向的权责均衡关系使村集体经济组织与小农户之间建立起有机的利益联结,从而使该组织对小农户的组织和动员成为可能。
This paper discusses how small-scale household producers are organized and who bear the organization costs through the comparison of different types of agricultural contracting services,which are either supported by the government,provided by market-oriented organizations or supplied by rural collective economic organizations.The agricultural contracting services that are supported by the government may attract small-scale household producers to act in concert and buy the same services,but this organization is temporary.The market-oriented organizations may facilitate small-scale household producers to be matched with large-scale producers in purchasing services,or replace small-scale household producers with large-scale producers through land transfer.In these practices,small-scale household producers are passive participants,and are not actually organized.Rural collective economic organizations may rebuild the balance of rights and obligations between themselves and small-scale household producers,and covering the costs of organizing small producers by charging for the services.The re-balancing of rights and obligations between rural collective economic organizations and small producers could build dynamic connections between them,which makes it possible for the former to organize and mobilize small producers.
出处
《中国农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2024年第1期48-64,共17页
Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“农业生产社会化服务与小农户的组织机制研究”(23BSH068)。
关键词
农业社会化服务
小农户
组织化
村集体经济组织
Agricultural contracting services
Small-scale household producers
Organizing of small-scale household producers
Rural collective economic organization
