摘要
明确程序出罪的界定标准,需要澄清“程序出罪与出罪方式绑定”的误区,并且需要解构与反思“需罚性”标准和“自由裁量权”标准。程序出罪的界定应当结合具体出罪事由进行判断。《刑事诉讼法》第16条作为贯穿刑事诉讼法的出罪条款,既包含了出罪方式,也包含了出罪事由;既包含了实体出罪事由,也包含了程序出罪事由。对程序出罪事由进行体系化解读,可以以《刑事诉讼法》第16条为引,将出罪事由分为“情节判断型”“特定条件型”和“诉讼要件缺失型”,并在此基础上构建阶层性的程序出罪事由体系。从而,有利于进一步厘清程序出罪与实体出罪的界限,对实践中出罪方式的错用纠偏,为程序出罪理论研究作铺垫。
Defining procedural decriminalization criteria requires clarifying the misconception that"procedural decriminalization is tied to its committing manner"and requires deconstructing and rethinking the criteria of"punitiveness"and"discretion".The connotation and boundaries of procedural decriminalization should be judged in the context of the specific causes.Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Law,as the decriminalization provision throughout the Criminal Procedure Law,contains both the instruments and the causes of decriminalization;it contains both the substantive causes and the procedural causes of decriminalization.In a systematic analysis of Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Law,the causes of decriminalization can be classified as"circumstantial","specific conditions"and"absence of procedural elements",and on this basis,a hierarchical system of procedural causes of crime is constructed.The interpretation of procedural decriminalization is conducive to further clarifying the boundaries between procedural and substantive decriminalization,and to correcting the misuse of decriminalization instruments in practice,which will pave the way for the study of procedural decriminalization theory.
基金
上海高水平地方高校创新团队“依法行政与公正司法的中国进路研究”的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
程序出罪
实体出罪
出罪事由
体系化
解释学
procedural decriminalization
substantive decriminalization
decriminalization causes
systematization
hermeneutics
