摘要
刑事附带民事公益诉讼已成为检察机关办理民事公益诉讼案件的重要途径。由于缺乏基础理论与制度规范的支持,相关的司法实践呈现出多样化的形态。尽管是借用刑事附带民事诉讼和民事公益诉讼的规定来实现维护社会公共利益的目的,但刑事附带民事公益诉讼并非刑事附带民事诉讼与民事公益诉讼的简单结合。现有的“一条两款”难以满足司法实践对法律适用的需求。刑事附带民事公益诉讼制度的建构需要厘清四对基础关系,即刑事附带民事公益诉讼与刑事附带民事诉讼、“等内”与“等外”、检察机关与其他起诉主体、刑事审判与民事审判。在增加法律供给的同时,检察机关对提起刑事附带民事公益诉讼应保持谦抑与克制,实际提起的诉讼应限定在法定范围之内并应考虑诉的必要性。
The incidental civil public interest actions has been an important way for the people's procuratorate to protect the public interest.Due to the lack of support from basic theories and institutional norms,relevant judicial practice presents a variety of forms.Although the provisions of criminal incidental civil litigation and civil public interest litigation are borrowed to achieve the purpose of safeguarding social and public interests,criminal incidental civil public interest litigation is not a simple combination of criminal incidental civil litigation and civil public interest litigation.The existing“one article and two clauses”cannot meet the needs of judicial practice for the application of law.The construction of the system of civil public interest litigation incidental to criminal justice needs to clarify four pairs of basic relationships,namely,civil public interest litigation incidental to criminal law and civil litigation incidental to criminal law,“inside”and“outside”,procuratorial organs and other prosecuting subjects,and criminal trial and civil trial.While increasing the legal supply,the procuratorate should maintain modesty and restraint in initiating criminal incidental civil public interest litigation,and the actual litigation should be limited to the statutory scope and the necessity of litigation should be considered.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期162-175,共14页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金一般项目(21BFX210)“生态环境修复公私法责任协同研究”。
关键词
刑事附带民事公益诉讼
刑事附带民事诉讼
民事公益诉讼
诉的必要性
criminal incidental civil public interest actions
criminal incidental civil litigation
civil public interest actions
necessity of litigation
