摘要
生态环境损害赔偿制度的确立试行,在我国环境司法领域形成了生态环境损害赔偿诉讼、环境民事公益诉讼、环境行政公益诉讼等多元程序并轨运行的格局。但由于当前法律规范层面的阙如,多元程序并轨并未形成环境协作共治的理想愿景,反而导致司法实践面临混沌与冲突交织的现实困境。以美国环境公共利益司法体系的整合与型构为镜鉴,按照我国传统的"民-行"二分的基本模式,依循"预防(环境风险预防诉讼)+填补(生态环境损害赔偿诉讼)+监督(检察公益诉讼)"三位一体的功能导向,可以对我国环境公共利益司法多元程序进行体系化整合与型构。
As the compensation system for ecological environment damages is established and put into the trail implementation,China has formed a pattern of diversification procedure of the damages litigation of ecological environment,the environmental civil public interest litigation and the environmental administrative public interest litigation operated together in the environmental judicial field.However,in terms of the absence in the current law norms,the diversification procedure operated together does not reach the ideal vision of coordination and co-governance for environment,but leads to juridical practice falling on hard times intertwining confusion with conflict.With reference to the integration and creation of the American environmental public interest judicial system,according to Chinese traditional basic model of"civil-administrative"dichotomy,diversification procedure in Chinese environmental public interest judicial system can be systematically integrated and created following the triad function-oriented pattern of"precaution(the environmental precautionary public interest litigation)+complement(the damages litigation of ecological environment)+supervision(the procuratorial public interest litigation).
作者
周勇飞
高利红
ZHOU Yong-fei;GAO Li-hong
出处
《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期23-27,126,127,共7页
Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“完善生态环境保护执法与司法衔接机制研究”(项目编号:20ZDA090)
2019年湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目“湖北乡村自然保护地生态旅游发展环境风险法律规制研究”(项目编号:19Q118)。
