摘要
围绕减少审前羁押这一刑事司法的关键议题,决策者对逮捕审查提出了实质化要求。作为基本权干预措施,逮捕的正当目的仅限于防御性质的保证诉讼顺利进行。被追诉人具有法定的社会危险性是逮捕正当化的前提,社会危险性的查明对政策落实至关重要。囿于对逮捕目的的错误认识,司法实践形成了以罪刑预测为内容、以书面审查为手段的审查模式,偏离了逮捕审查的应然方向。落实逮捕的实质化审查,不仅需要明确社会危险性的具体标准,更要为审查者提供查明社会危险性的平台工具。对此,应当加快构建诉讼化的审查框架,建立“三角式”的外观结构和“正当程序化”的内部运作机制,以审查逮捕听证实现实质的社会危险性审查。
Policy makers demand for a substantive examination of arrest around the key topic to reduce pre-trial detention in criminal justice.The legitimate purpose of arrest cannot ignore the defensive nature of ensuring a smooth judicial process.To avoid any dangerous act of the defendant justifies an arrest.Thus to clarify whether the defendant is dangerous or not is the key to the application of arrest.Due to a misunderstanding of the purpose of arrest,the procuratorate has developed a model of examination holding the prediction of conviction and sentencing as its main content and written review,the main method.This is not in accord with the purpose of examination of arrest.The implementation of the substantive examination of arrest not only requires the clarification of the specific criteria of the danger the defendant may bring,but also needs to provide for the reviewer platforms and tools to identify the possible dangers in question.For this reason,the authorities should speed up the construction of a litigation-oriented framework of examination and establish a proper structure and due procedural mechanism of internal operation.
作者
聂友伦
NIE Youlun(School of Law,East China Normal University)
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
北大核心
2023年第4期80-89,共10页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
教育部人文社科青年项目“司法解释权的行使规则建构研究”(22YJC820026)阶段性成果。
关键词
审查逮捕
社会危险性
实质审查
诉讼化
Arrest examination
Social danger
Substantive examination
Litigization
