摘要
不予受理裁定是人民法院对民事主体所提之诉拒绝审理而作出的否定性裁判。经实证研究表明,在全面推行立案登记制改革后,实践中仍存在失当不予受理情形,进而导致程序空转困境,严重制约诉权行使保护和正当程序保障。文章立足于不予受理的价值和功能,经由对诉讼要件和诉讼程序的审视,提出为促进程序空转问题得到妥善解决,理论层面要将一元化的审查要件精细区分,制度层面须去除不予受理裁定,实践层面应完善审查程序。
The ruling of non-acceptance is a negative judgment made by the people’s court in response to the refusal of the civil subject to hear the lawsuit.Empirical research has shown that after the comprehensive implementation of the registration system reform,there are still cases of inappropriate and inadmissible cases in practice,which leads to the dilemma of procedural idling and seriously restricts the exercise of litigation rights protection and due process protection.The article is based on the value and function of inadmissibility.After examining the litigation elements and procedures,it is proposed that in order to promote the proper resolution of the issue of procedural idling,the unified review elements should be finely distinguished at the theoretical level,the inadmissibility ruling should be removed at the institutional level,and the review procedure should be improved at the practical level.
作者
万欣涛
WAN Xin-tao(Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2023年第7期67-71,共5页
Journal of Harbin University
关键词
不予受理
程序空转
诉讼要件
程序保障
rejection
procedure idling
elements of litigation
procedural guarantee
