摘要
德日两国历史课程标准对“二战”的起因、经过、结果和战争责任四个方面的叙述均迥然有别,表明两国对“二战”反省态度存在显著差异。这种差异与其国家认同建构的策略有关。德国推行以宪政爱国主义为基础的国家认同,宪政爱国主义要求与专制独裁制度决裂、维护民主宪政价值观,这在德国教育文件和历史课程标准中均得以体现。日本推行混合式的国家认同,制度认同、文化认同和民族认同形成张力,国家认同建构进退失据,导致日本学习指导要领对“二战”的相关叙述闪烁其词。
There are obvious differences in the narration of the course,process,result and res ponsibility of the Second World W ar between Germany and Japan.The differences lie in their national identity.Germany promotes national identity based on constitutional pa triotism which requires to break away from autocratic dictatorship system and maintain democratic constitutional values.This is reflected in educat ional documents and history curriculum standards.Japan promotes mixed na tional identity.Institutional identity,cultural identity and ethnic identity form tensions,which dominates national identity,leading to Japan's irresponsible narration of the Second World War.
作者
张汉林
唐艳
Zhang Hanlin;Tang Yan
出处
《课程．教材．教法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期99-106,共8页
Curriculum，Teaching Material and Method
关键词
历史课程标准
国家认同
德日比较
“二战”
history curriculum standards
national identity
comparison between Germany and Japan
the Second World War
