期刊文献+

原则主义的理论进路、伦理争论及其启示 被引量:1

The Theoretical Approach, Ethical Debate and Enlightenment of Principlism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 原则主义作为全球生命伦理学最有影响力的理论进路,是对生命伦理学作为一门学科问题的回答,也是经典哲学理论在该领域中脆弱性的必然结果。然而,自产生伊始,原则主义就深陷批评和质疑的漩涡之中,包含原则一致性、常识道德问题、道德地位和方法论等。对这些争论的回应和批评性意见的包容、选择性吸纳,使原则主义释放出强大的理论生命力。原则主义本质上是对于生命伦理学的思考,对于我们参与全球生命伦理学发展提供中国话语给予深刻启示。 As the most influential theoretical approach of global bioethics,principlism is the answer to the question of bioethics as a discipline,and also the inevitable result of the fragility of classical philosophical theories in this field.However,since its emergence,principlism is mired in a spiral of criticism and questioning,including principle consistency,common sense moral issues,moral status and methodology.The response to these debates and the inclusive and selective absorption of critical opinions have released a strong theoretical vitality of principlism.Principlism is essentially a reflection on bioethics,which gives profound enlightenment to our participation in global bioethics by providing Chinese discourse.
作者 陈化 CHEN Hua(School of Marxism,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 北大核心 2023年第6期1-6,共6页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2019年国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA039)。
关键词 原则主义 理论进路 伦理争议 principlism theoretical approach ethical debate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献22

  • 1DeGrazia, David. "Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003,(13):227. 被引量:1
  • 2Green, R. M. , Gert, B. , Clouser, K.D. "The Method of Public Morality versus the Method of Principlism". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993, (18):477. 被引量:1
  • 3Beauchamp, Tom Land DeGrazia,David. "Principle and Princilism". Handbook of Bioethics, edited by George, Khushf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 57. 被引量:1
  • 4Beauchamp, Tom L. "Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995, (5) : 181. 被引量:1
  • 5Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001 : 3. 被引量:1
  • 6Richardson, H.S. "Specifying Norms as a Way to Re solve Concrete Ethical Problems". Philosophy and Public Af- fairs. 1990,(19):279-310. 被引量:1
  • 7Gert, Bernard, Culver, Charles M. and Clouser, Danner. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press, 1997:71. 被引量:1
  • 8Lustig, B. A. The Method of 'Principlism' : a Critique of the Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1992, (17) :489. 被引量:1
  • 9Beauehamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Princi pies of Biomedical Ethics. New York. Oxford University Press, 1994: 106. 被引量:1
  • 10许志伟.生命伦理--对当代生命科技的道德评估[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006:11. 被引量:1

共引文献30

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部