期刊文献+

生命伦理学“四原则说”与“允许原则说”比较研究

Comparative Study of “Four Principles” and “Permission Principle” in Bioethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比彻姆和丘卓斯的四原则说和恩格尔哈特的允许原则说是当今生命伦理学界有关原则主义争论的重要关注点。它们在理论基础、理论构建的路径、普适原则的建构方式以及对理性功能的看法上,的确存在着差异;但它们在坚持原则主义、认可普适性原则、承认多元化的道德境遇、珍视生命等方面则是共同的。反思它们的异同,对我国生命伦理学原则的重建和本土化生命伦理学建构具有重要启示。 Beauchamp and Childress' "four principles" and Engelhardt's "permission principle" are important theories on the principle of bioethics.There are differences in their theoretical bases,theoretical construct paths,the universal principle construction methods and the rational function views,while they share a lot in common in insisting on their principles,authorizing universality principle,admitting diversified moral situations,cherishing life,etc.Reflecting on their similarities and differences is inspirational to our efforts in rebuilding bioethics and its localization in our country.
作者 刘英
出处 《湖北文理学院学报》 2012年第9期44-48,共5页 Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science
关键词 四原则说 允许原则说 道德多元化 原则主义 本土生命伦理学 Four principles Permission principle Moral diversification Principlism Local bioethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献49

  • 1谢志青,肖华安.生命伦理学及其哲学前提[J].江西社会科学,2006,26(6):127-130. 被引量:7
  • 2DeGrazia, David. "Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003,(13):227. 被引量:1
  • 3Green, R. M. , Gert, B. , Clouser, K.D. "The Method of Public Morality versus the Method of Principlism". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993, (18):477. 被引量:1
  • 4Beauchamp, Tom Land DeGrazia,David. "Principle and Princilism". Handbook of Bioethics, edited by George, Khushf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 57. 被引量:1
  • 5Beauchamp, Tom L. "Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995, (5) : 181. 被引量:1
  • 6Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001 : 3. 被引量:1
  • 7Richardson, H.S. "Specifying Norms as a Way to Re solve Concrete Ethical Problems". Philosophy and Public Af- fairs. 1990,(19):279-310. 被引量:1
  • 8Gert, Bernard, Culver, Charles M. and Clouser, Danner. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press, 1997:71. 被引量:1
  • 9Lustig, B. A. The Method of 'Principlism' : a Critique of the Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1992, (17) :489. 被引量:1
  • 10Beauehamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Princi pies of Biomedical Ethics. New York. Oxford University Press, 1994: 106. 被引量:1

共引文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部