期刊文献+

生命伦理原则主义的中国式困境、成因及出路 被引量:2

Reasons and solutions of difficulties of bioethics principlism in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国生命伦理学领域,原则主义的决策框架遭遇实践困境,权利话语的"先天不足",自主原则的分离以及忽略了人们实际条件的能力模型是其困境之源。西方将尊重自主作为解决困境的出路,但这种模型将自主当作一个静止的概念,遮蔽了个体与社会的真实关系;由于中国文化思维的差异性以及处于社会转型的特殊时期,决定了原则主义之西方解决路径在中国不具有适切性。在中国语境下,儒家伦理能为消解原则主义困境提供本土化的道德资源,包括"仁爱"的道德基础、"经权"的方法论、情理结合的理性条件以及家庭的介入。 In the field of Chinese bioethics, the decision framework of principlism encountered some difficulties in practice. The “congenitally deficient” of rights discourse, the separation of principle of independence and competency modal which ignores people's actual conditions are the reasons for the diffi- culties. Western countries take respecting independence as a way to resolve the difficulties, but in this model, independence is a static concept, which has covered the true relationship between individuals and society; due to the different thinking in Chinese culture and the special period of social transformation in China, western solution of the principlism difficulty isn't applicable in China. In the context of China, the Confucian ethics can provide localized moral resources for resolving principlism difficulties, including the moral foundation of“benevolence ” , the methodology of“principle” , rational condition for the combin - ation of emotion and reason and the involvement of family.
作者 陈化 任俊华
出处 《长安大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第4期97-102,共6页 Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(11CZX057) 广州市哲学社会科学规划项目(10Q28)
关键词 原则主义 生命伦理 患者权利 儒家伦理 家庭决策 principlism bioethics sufferers' rights Confucian ethics family decisions
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献76

  • 1衣俊卿.当代哲学研究的前沿问题——哲学问题与问题哲学[J].中国社会科学,2006(5):4-9. 被引量:60
  • 2刘俊哲,徐国艮.道德困境呼唤儒家伦理——论儒家伦理的当代价值[J].理论学刊,2007(5):65-67. 被引量:3
  • 3DeGrazia, David. "Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003,(13):227. 被引量:1
  • 4Green, R. M. , Gert, B. , Clouser, K.D. "The Method of Public Morality versus the Method of Principlism". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993, (18):477. 被引量:1
  • 5Beauchamp, Tom Land DeGrazia,David. "Principle and Princilism". Handbook of Bioethics, edited by George, Khushf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 57. 被引量:1
  • 6Beauchamp, Tom L. "Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995, (5) : 181. 被引量:1
  • 7Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001 : 3. 被引量:1
  • 8Richardson, H.S. "Specifying Norms as a Way to Re solve Concrete Ethical Problems". Philosophy and Public Af- fairs. 1990,(19):279-310. 被引量:1
  • 9Gert, Bernard, Culver, Charles M. and Clouser, Danner. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press, 1997:71. 被引量:1
  • 10Lustig, B. A. The Method of 'Principlism' : a Critique of the Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1992, (17) :489. 被引量:1

共引文献92

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部