摘要
小词“或”的典型用法,一为存在量词,一为析取连接词。作为存在量词,“或”为逆辖的主体量词。借助主词存在和论域问题的分析,可以阐明渡鸦悖论实为伪装的眢论,因为它错将两个不同的命题等同起来。作为析取连接词,“或”兼有相容析取和不相容析取的用法。基于“或”的析取用法,我们可以将戴维森关于意志软弱的三要素修正为知“或”、去“惑”、起“行”三环节。
The particle “huo” is used in two different ways typically: as an existing quantifier, or as a disjunctive word. As an existing quantifier, “huo” functions as a subjective quantifier with reverse jurisdiction.By examining the existence of the subject and the jurisdiction scope, we can find out that the raven paradox is pseudo since it mistakenly identifies two different propositions. As a disjunctive word, “huo” sometimes combines compatible items and sometimes incompatible. The disjunction of “huo” helps to revise the three elements of the weakness of the will of Davison into knowing “huo”, overcoming the “puzzlement” and then starting to “act”.
出处
《社会科学》
北大核心
2023年第2期24-32,共9页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“逻辑词汇的历史演进与哲学问题研究”(项目编号:20&ZD046)的阶段性成果。
关键词
或
小词
眢论
渡鸦悖论
意志软弱
汉语言哲学
Huo
Particle
Paradox
Raven Paradox
Weakness of the Will
Linguistic Philosophy of Chinese
