摘要
认罪认罚从宽和以审判为中心的诉讼改革分别呈现出“检察主导”和“审判中心”的不同特质,两项改革的同时推进引发了法检两机关认识上的分歧。分歧主要体现在法院和检察院对《刑事诉讼法》第201条规定的不同理解上。量刑建议的“权力化”“精准化”和“软约束性”等特点导致“一般应当”这一具有“协商”性质的规定与当前刑事诉讼结构不能实现整体的制度兼容。为了协调推进两项改革,检察机关应不断提高量刑建议的质量,同时也要保持检察谦抑,审判机关要坚持独立裁判原则,同时也要尊重控辩合意,并加强诉讼文书的说理,积极与检察机关进行沟通协调。
The leniency of guilty plea and the trial centered litigation reform show different characteristics of prosecutor-led and trial-centered respectively.The simultaneous promotion of the two reforms has caused the difference of understanding between the two organs which are mainly reflected in the different interpretations of Article 201 of the Criminal Procedure Law.Features of sentencing suggestions such as power,precision and soft binding lead to the consultation nature of"generally should"and current criminal procedure structure incompatible with the overall system.In order to coordinate the two reforms,the procuratorial organs should constantly improve the quality of sentencing suggestions and maintain the modesty of the prosecution as well,while the judicial organs should adhere to the independent judgment,respect the agreement of the prosecution and defense,strengthen the reasoning of litigation documents,and actively communicate and cooperate with the procuratorial organs.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2022年第6期45-56,共12页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
华东政法大学硕士研究生学术研究及社会调研项目一等立项“检察机关提前介入监察调查的实践模式与机制建构——以‘嵌入式’检察功能发挥为视角”(2022-03-038)。
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
检察主导
审判中心
量刑建议
诉讼构造
leniency of guilty plea
prosecutor-led
trial-centered
sentencing suggestions
litigation construction
