摘要
RCEP包含了较高水平的投资章节,但暂时搁置了投资者与国家间争端解决机制。中国与东盟国家可以利用RCEP国家间争端解决机制寻求救济,但该机制主要是为贸易协定设计的,在保护和救济投资者权益方面作用有限。中国与东盟国家投资者可以利用中国与东盟国家现有投资协定中的投资者与国家间争端解决机制寻求救济,但这些机制也存在各自的局限,例如低水平的投资实体保护、严格限制的仲裁管辖范围、罕见狭窄的条约适用范围等。中国与其他RCEP缔约方应积极探索构建一个融合争端预防、磋商、调解、仲裁和(或)诉讼等多种方式的投资者与国家间争端解决机制。
RCEP contains a high-level investment chapter, but does not provide for investor-state dispute settlement(ISDS). China and ASEAN countries can use state-state dispute settlement(SSDS) in RCEP to seek relief, but such SSDS is mainly designed for trade agreements and has a limited role in protecting and relieving the investor’s rights. Investors from China and ASEAN countries can use ISDS mechanisms in existing investment agreements between China and ASEAN countries to seek relief, but such ISDS mechanisms also have their own limitations, such as low-level substantive investment protection, strictly restricted jurisdiction scope and rarely narrow scope of application. China and other RCEP Parties should actively explore the establishment of ISDS that integrates mulitiple methods such as dispute prevention, consultation, mediation, arbitration and/or litigation.
作者
王彦志
Wang Yanzhi(Law School of Jilin University,Changchun Jilin 130012)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期86-96,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“‘一带一路’倡议下中国视角的国际投资规则创新研究”(批准号:18BFX214)阶段性研究成果。
