摘要
阐释学始终致力于处理、协调好阐释活动中的冲突性因素,以完成对于意义整体性、融贯性的追求。通过阐释自证这一心理动力,阐释对象、阐释主体与阐释关系中的冲突性要素能够得到具体的协调和统一。广泛的阐释自证需要依赖方法论层面的理论工具,而阐释工具的建构也源于阐释自证的需要。在实践层面上,阐释性的理论工具所构成的阐释资源存在着分布的不平衡,通过承认阐释自证的基础性作用,能够在理论层面提供克服阐释不公的根基,并为构建良性的公共关系、维护公共阐释的空间提供助力。
Hermeneutics has always sought to address and coordinate the conflicting elements of hermeneutics in order to achieve a holistic and coherent pursuit of meaning.Through the psychological dynamics of hermeneutic self-evidence,the conflicting elements of the hermeneutic object,the hermeneutic subject and the hermeneutic relationship can be concretely coordinated and unified.Extensive hermeneutic self-evidence relies on theoretical tools at the methodological level,and the construction of hermeneutic tools stems from the need for hermeneutic self-evidence.
出处
《中国文学批评》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期147-154,190,共9页
Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism
