摘要
生态环境法典编纂为风险预防原则的实体构造提供了契机。生态环境风险的泛化趋势,使得以往以科技理性为核心的损害预防环境治理取向面临转向选择。国家环境法律规范体系中的预防原则存在象征性立法问题,导致学界针对风险预防内涵的差异性解读。生态环境法典编纂现已进入立法论阶段,需对科学不确定下的环境风险做出必要回应:在总则中确立包容性的风险预防原则;通过重构环境法律关系,在“权力—职责”“权利—义务”立体结构的指引下,在分则中以“主体+义务+责任”的方式构建风险因应制度,形成体系化的动态环境风险规制模式。
The compilation of the ecological environment code provides an opportunity for the substantial construction of the risk prevention principle.The generalization trend of ecological and environmental risks makes the former damage prevention and environmental governance orientation with scientific and technological rationality as the core face choices.The symbolic legislation of the precautionary principle in the national environmental legal norm system has led to the different interpretations of the connotation of risk prevention in the academic circle;this is in contrast to the dual direction of the precautionary principle and the separation of the should be state;analyze the scientific uncertainty faced by the risk prevention principle in the code,and recognize the flexible interval demand of the code system for risk prevention;criticize the cost-benefit analysis with strong bureaucratic technicalism.The compilation of ecological environmental code has entered the stage of legislation,which requires necessary responses to environmental risks under scientific uncertainty:the principle of inclusive risk prevention should be established in the general provisions;through the reconstruction of environmental legal relations,under the guidance of the three-dimensional structure of“power responsibility”and“right obligation”,the risk response system is constructed in the way of“subject+obligation+responsibility”in the specific rules,forming a systematic dynamic environmental risk regulation model.
出处
《理论月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第12期94-108,共15页
Theory Monthly
基金
北京师范大学学科交叉基金项目“应对气候变化的碳排放环境风险司法控制研究”(BNUXKJC2208)。
关键词
科学不确定性
生态环境法典
风险预防原则
环境风险
预防原则
scientific uncertainty
environmental code
risk prevention principle
environmental risk
precautionary principle
