摘要
专业群建设是影响我国高职教育高质量发展的重要因素,一定程度上引领高职院校的改革发展的方向。我国专业群建设政策演进经历了形成期、发展期、提质期和深化期四个时期。历史制度主义视角下,专业群建设政策的时空逻辑、行动逻辑、牵引逻辑呈现出从适应到引领、从扩增到提质、从就业到发展的演化形态。面对新的发展形势和需求,我国专业群建设政策应坚持注重体系结构优化与相关制度的创新,注重专业群资源整合,凸显聚集效应,建立“以学习者为中心”的专业群育人模式,以专业群内涵建设提升职业教育国际影响力等改革策略,坚定不移走中国特色的高职教育发展道路。
The construction of specialty groups is an important factor affecting the high-quality development of higher vocational education in China,and to a certain extent leads the direction of the reform and development of higher vocational colleges.The policy evolution of specialty group construction has gone through four periods:formation period,development period,quality improvement period and deepening period.From the perspective of historical institutionalism,the spatiotemporal logic,action logic,and traction logic of specialty group construction policies show an evolutionary pattern from adaptation to guidance,from expansion to quality improvement,and from employment to development.Facing the new development situation and demands,specialty group construction policies in China should insist on focusing on system structure optimization and related system innovation,focusing on the integration of specialty group resources,highlighting the aggregation effect,establishing a“learner-centered”education model for specialty groups,and utilizing connotation construction of specialty groups.And it should implement reform strategies such as enhancing the international influence of vocational education with the connotation of specialty groups should,and unswervingly follow the development path of higher vocational education with Chinese characteristics.
作者
李存园
岑洁玲
雷志成
LI Cun-yuan;CEN Jie-ling;LEI Zhi-cheng(Zhongshan Torch Pdytechmic.Zhongshan 528436,China)
出处
《高等职业教育探索》
2022年第6期7-14,共8页
Higher Vocational Education Exploration
基金
广东省教育科学“十三五”规划项目“‘双高计划’下高职院校专业群高质量发展机制构建与运行研究”(2019GXJK235)
2020年广东省教育科学青年创新人才项目“‘双高计划’下广东高职院校高水平专业群协同发展机制研究”(2020WQNCX207)
2021年广东省教育科研课题(高等教育专项)“高水平专业群建设与运行质量研究”(2021GXJK550)。
关键词
高等职业教育
专业群建设
历史制度主义
政策
higher vocational education
specialty group construction
historical institutionalism
policy
