摘要
目的:借助文献计量工具绘制出中医药治疗盆腔炎性疾病后遗症(SPID)的知识图谱,了解近年关于本病研究的具体内容、发展现状与研究热点。方法:检索中国知网数据库、万方数据库、维普数据库中2017—2021年收录的中医药治疗盆腔炎性疾病后遗症文献,利用可视化工具CiteSpace对文献的发布时间、作者、关键词、研究机构进行可视化分析。结果:共纳入期刊文献8920篇,核心作者106位,研究机构472个。其中发文量最多的学者为刘金星,发文量最多的机构为山东中医药大学。不同地域之间各学者及机构之间合作分散,未形成良好的多中心跨地域合作关系。除去与主题相关的关键词后,“中药灌肠”为频数最高的关键词,共出现618次;除“慢性盆腔炎”外,“抗生素”为中介中心性最高的关键词,中心性为0.84,未超过1。在整个图谱中起到桥梁作用的节点数量较少,研究热点较为分散。结论:中医药研究盆腔炎性疾病后遗症的文献数量一直保持较高水平,但近2年有下降趋势。不同地域之间作者、研究机构的合作较少,研究热点分散,主要集中于临床研究,关于疾病机制的研究尚不足。
Objective:To develop a knowledge map of pelvic inflammatory disease sequelae(SPID)with the help of bibliometric tools,and to gain a comprehensive understanding of the specific content,development status and research hotspots of research on this disease in recent years.Methods:The visualization tools CiteSpace were used to visualize and analyze the time,authors,keywords,and research institutions of the literature on Chinese medicine for SPID included in CNKI,WANFANG DATA,VIP DATA from January 2017 to January 2021.Results:Among the 8920 journal articles,106 core authors and 472 research institutions were included,among which the scholar with the highest number of publications was LIU Jinxing and the institution with the highest number of publications was Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.The cooperation among scholars and institutions in different regions is decentralized,and a good multi center and cross regional cooperation relationship has not been formed.After excluding keywords related to the topic,"Chinese medicine enema"was the keyword with the highest frequency,appearing 618 times,and in addition to"chronic pelvic inflammation","antibiotics"was the keyword with the highest intermediary centrality,with a centrality of 0.84,not exceeding 1,which shows that the number of nodes playing the role of a bridge in the whole map is low.The number of nodes that play a bridging role is relatively small,and the research hotspots are relatively scattered.Conclusion:The number of literature on the study of sequelae of pelvic inflammatory diseases in traditional Chinese medicine has been maintained at a high level,but has a downward trend in the past two years.There is less cooperation between authors and research institutions in different regions,and research hotspots are scattered,mainly focusing on clinical research.Research on disease mechanism is still insufficient.
作者
余阳祺
林洁
YU Yangqi;LIN Jie(The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha Hunan 410007,China)
出处
《中医药导报》
2022年第10期161-166,共6页
Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
湖南省卫生健康委员会课题项目(202205014138)。
