摘要
在乡村振兴背景下,协商的高质量发展能发挥其独特优势,增强改革动力,确保民意基础。结合国际前沿的协商系统理论和本土实践,构建了以协商能力和利益关联度为主要变量、以协商规模为限定条件的农村社区协商系统质量分析框架。根据协商能力和利益关联度的不同,划分形成高协商能力—高利益关联型的高质量协商系统,高协商能力—低利益关联型、低协商能力—高利益关联型的中质量协商系统,低协商能力—低利益关联型的低质量协商系统等四种类型。以全国首批农村社区治理实验区中的5个协商案例为对象展开分析比较,发现其总体上均达到较高质量的协商系统。研究还表明:当前高质量协商系统建设要以培育协商能力为首要任务;实现利益聚合和利益代表的制度化建设是发展高质量协商系统的重要环节;协商规模具有继续向小规模正式协商与大规模非正式协商相结合方向发展和突破的可能;我国农村社区的协商实验弥补了西方协商系统研究的不足,实现了拓展转化与本土创新。
In the context of rural revitalization,the promotion of high-quality development through deliberation can leverage its unique advantages to enhance reform momentum and ensure popular support.In combination with existing research and based on deliberation system theory,we build up a framework for quality construction of rural community deliberation system,using deliberation capacity and the benefit correlation as the main variables and the deliberation scale as restricted condition.According to the difference of deliberation capacity and interest correlation degree,four types of deliberation system are formed,such as high-quality deliberation system with high deliberation capacity-high interest relevance type,medium quality deliberation system with high deliberation capacity-low interest relevance type and low deliberation capacity-high interest relevance type,and low-quality deliberation system with low deliberation capacity-low interest relevance type.Five sample cases of deliberation in the first batch of rural community governance experimental areas in China are taken as the analysis objects to carry out detailed demonstration and comparison.The research shows that the construction of high-quality deliberation system should take the deliberation capacity as the primary goal and that it is an important link in the construction of high-quality deliberation system that realization of institutionalization of interest aggregation and interest representation.In addition,there is a possibility to continue to develop and breakthrough in the direction of combining small-scale formal deliberation with large-scale informal deliberation.The deliberation experiment in rural communities in China makes up for the insufficiency of the western deliberation system research,and realizes the expansion,transformation and local innovation.
作者
张大维
赵益晨
Zhang Dawei;Zhao Yichen(Institute for China Rural Studies/Institute for Advanced Study in Political Science,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,P.R.China)
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期133-144,共12页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目“协商系统理论下农村社区治理的参与—回应联动机制研究”(20BZZ020)。
关键词
高质量协商
乡村振兴
协商系统
协商能力
利益关联度
High-quality deliberation
Rural revitalization
Deliberation system
Deliberation capacity
Interest correlation degree
