摘要
共同归责与单独归责的争议焦点在于各共同犯罪人不法判断的共同性抑或个别性。共同归责论者将各共同犯罪人的行为捏合为一个整体行为进而达致共同不法的论证方法并不可取。各共同犯罪人的不法应单独判断。单独归责论者所采用的行为相互延伸的论证方法实际上表明其并非像所宣称的那样仅仅承认各共同犯罪人之间的事实牵连关系。不能否定各共同犯罪人之间的规范牵连关系。共同归责中的“共同”与单独归责中的“单独”都并非十分准确的表述。归责视角之于共同犯罪体系的意义在于开发出共同犯罪归责问题的不同面向,即“不法归属的前提范围”“不法归属的本体范围”“不法的归属程度”“罪责的归咎程度”。
The focus of the disputes between common imputation and single imputation lies in the commonality or individuality of the illegal judgment of each joint offender.It is not advisable for the demonstration method by which common imputation theorists combine the behavior of each joint criminal into a whole behavior,and then arrive at common illegality.The illegality of each joint offender should be judged separately.In fact,the argument method of mutual extension of behaviors adopted by the single imputation theorists shows that it does not merely recognize the factual relationship between the joint offenders as they claimed.We cannot deny The normative relationship between the joint criminals cannot be denied.Neither the“common”in the common imputation nor the“single”in the single imputation arequite accurate expressions.The significance of the attribution perspective in the joint crime system lies in the development of different aspects of the attribution problem of joint crime,that is,“the premise scope of illegal attribution”,“the ontological scope of illegal attribution”,“the degree of illegal attribution”,“the degree of guilt attribution”.
作者
刘纯燕
Liu Chunyan(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430070)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2022年第5期90-101,共12页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词
共同犯罪
共同归责
单独归责
joint crime
common imputation
single imputation
