摘要
私鉴定意见在民事诉讼中有一定应用,但其性质、定位在我国立法和司法上始终模糊不清。在法定证据种类前提下,私鉴定意见无法被任何一种法定证据类型所囊括。在传统证据视角无法对私鉴定意见定位时,应当摒弃这种视角,而将私鉴定意见定性为包含事实主张和证明作用的当事人陈述。在此前提下,当私鉴定意见属于当事人听取时,由法院判断其是否有必要成为待证事实;当私鉴定意见属于当事人询问时,在当事人陈述质证规则供应不足的情况下,应根据新《民事证据规定》第41条对其进行质证,以私鉴定意见的科学性和党派性为质证要点;当一方当事人故意提交虚假私鉴定意见时,应当承担其诉讼行为不发生法律效力的后果。
Private appraisal is widely used in civil litigation.But its nature and position has always been ambiguous in our country's legislation and judiciary.In the strict proof mode,private identification cannot be covered by the eight types of legal evidence.From the purpose and function of private appraisal and the role of the entrustment system,the traditional evidence perspective should be abandoned,and the private appraisal opinion should be characterized as a statement of the parties that contains factual claims and proof functions.Under this premise,when the role of the private appraisal is to determine the litigation claim,it is the party's statement,and the court will judge whether it is necessary to become a fact to be proved;when the private appraisal is excluded from the party's statement,only the objecting party meets the objection requirements.Only then can the validity of the private appraisal be denied.
作者
宋阁阁
谢文哲
SONG Ge-ge;XIE Wen-zhe(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《海南开放大学学报》
2022年第2期130-138,共9页
Journal of Hainan Open University
关键词
私鉴定意见
当事人陈述
待证事实
证据效力
private appraisal opinion
litigant's statement
fact to be proved
effect of evidence
