摘要
当事人作为案件纠纷的亲历者,通说认为其在诉讼中兼具阐明案情与证明事实等多重功能。我国民诉法将当事人陈述仅定位于法定的证据种类,未明晰界定其陈述范围,立法规定粗疏简陋,缺乏相应的程序保障和制度规制,使作为证据资料的当事人陈述在实践中几乎被形式化和虚无化。文章立足于现有法律和司法解释规定,合理区分主张性和证据性当事人陈述之间的区别,明确其主体、启动方式、适用场景与程序、适用条件与效力等事项,并辅之以真实陈述义务、具结制度以及虚假陈述制裁手段,是当前社会背景下激发我国当事人陈述之证明价值的应循路径。
As the witness of the case,the parties generally believe that they have the multiple functions of clarifying the case and proving the facts.In China’s civil procedure law,the party’s statement is only located in the legal type of evidence,and the scope of the statement is not clearly defined.The legislative provisions are rough and simple,and there is no corresponding procedural guarantee and system regulation,so that the statement of the parties as evidence is almost formalized in practice.Based on the existing laws and judicial interpretation,this paper reasonably distinguishes the difference between the assertive and evidentiary party statements,clarifies the subject,the starting mode,the applicable scene and procedure,the applicable conditions and effectiveness,and is supplemented by the obligation of true statement,the system of affidavit and the sanction of false statement,which is the proof price to stimulate the statement of the parties in China under the current social background.
作者
姜情缘
JIANG Qing-yuan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2021年第1期66-71,共6页
Journal of Harbin University
关键词
当事人陈述
当事人听取
当事人讯问
证据资料
补充性
the party’s statement
the party hearing
the party interrogation
evidence
supplementary
