摘要
湖南“苗疆”作为整个“苗疆”的重要组成部分,不等同于“湘西苗疆”。梳理湖南“苗疆”历史文献与已有研究成果,发现历史文献著者与当代相关学者对于湖南“苗疆”同一土司改土归流时间的判定存在明显差异。而改土归流对于“苗疆”从一种特殊区域转化为普通区域,是一个客观的过程,因此有必要分别明晰其起始与完成时间。雍正《硃批奏折》详细记载了这一区域土司改土归流的整个过程以及不同时间节点清朝廷的举措,反映这一区域改土归流过程中清廷对区域环境的认知与严密思考,呈现出当时土司自身实力、所处地理位置及其与清廷关系等,对最终改土归流进行的先后顺序所造成的显著影响。
As an important part of "Miaojiang", Hunan-Miaojiang is not equivalent to "Xiangxi Miaojiang". Combing the historical documents of Hunan-Miaojiang and the research results of today’s scholars, it is found that there are obvious differences in the time about Bureaucratization of the same chieftain of Hunan-Miaojiang. The initiation and completion of Bureaucratization is an objective process for the transformation of Miaojiang from a special area to an ordinary area. Therefore, the start and completion time should be clear. TheMemorials with Yongzheng’s Comments records in detail the entire process and actions at different time points of Qing Dynasty about the Bureaucratization. It records and reflects that the Qing has a clear regional recognition in the process of the reformation of this region. Know and think carefully. The sequence of the final reform of the local government was significantly influenced by factors such as the strength of the chieftain at the time, the geographical location and the relationship with the Qing.
出处
《青海民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期154-160,共7页
Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
基金
云南省社科规划项目“明清时期西南地方官员与土司土地纷争治理研究”(批准号:QN202028)阶段性成果。
