摘要
作为迄今为止中国参与的最重要的区域自贸协定,RCEP数据跨境流动规则充分兼顾了缔约方之间经济发展和法律制度的差异,在倡导数据跨境自由流动的同时,设置了“公共政策目标”与“基本安全利益”例外条款。但RCEP对该例外条款的范围和适用标准并未明确,因此存在适用上的不确定性。我国现阶段的数据跨境流动规制强调数据安全的维护,与RCEP数据跨境自由流动的原则不符。我国需在国内立法中根据RCEP的相关规则进一步强调数据自由流动的原则、统一相关概念的界定、健全数据分级分类规则、明确数据跨境流动安全评估标准,同时扩充“不符措施清单”,以保证我国数据跨境流动规制措施在RCEP规则下的合法性。
As the most important regional free trade agreement China has participated in so far, the RCEP’s rules on cross-border data flows fully accommodate the differences in economic development and legal systems among contracting parties. While promoting the free flow of data across borders, RCEP sets up “public policy objectives”and “basic security interests” exceptions for data localization measures. Due to the ambiguity of the scope and application standards, there is uncertainty in the application of the exceptions. China’s current rules and regulations focus on the maintenance of data security, which is inconsistent with the free flow of data across borders promoted by RCEP. Accordingly, China should take measures such as emphasizing the free flow of data across borders, improving laws and regulations to promote consistency with the wording used in RCEP, improving the rules on data classification, clarifying the security assessment criteria for cross-border data flows, and expanding the list of “nonconforming measures”, so as to ensure the validity of its regulatory measures of cross-border data flows under RCEP.
作者
张晓君
屈晓濛
Zhang Xiaojun;Qu Xiaomeng(School of International Law of Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期109-119,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“对‘一带一路’沿线国家投资风险监测预警体系研究”(批准号:19JZD053)
“博士后国际交流计划”引进项目(重庆专项)“《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)实施中的问题研究”(批准号:YJ20210338)
重庆市教育委员会人文社科重点研究基地项目“RCEP数字贸易争端解决机制研究”(批准号:22SKJD036)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
RCEP数据跨境流动
例外条款
中国因应
RCEP cross-border data flows
exception provisions
China’s response
