摘要
RCEP第12章"电子商务"原则上不适用RCEP争端解决程序,但允许缔约方选择适用。这引发了中国是否应当同意数据跨境流动条款具有可诉性的讨论。RCEP数据跨境流动条款中设置的"公共政策例外"与"基本安全利益例外"将为我国数据跨境流动规制措施提供政策空间,但我国仍须以非歧视的方式进行规制,同时对安全评估、关键信息基础设施等规则进一步澄清。此外,承认RCEP数据跨境流动条款可诉性,将有助于我国避免他国的制度性歧视。因此,承认RCEP数据跨境流动条款可诉性符合我国国家利益,但仍应以此承诺换取他国对等安排。
RCEP dispute settlement shall not be applied to Chapter 12 Electronic Commerce in principle but member States may opt-in nonetheless.This consequently leads to the discussion about whether China shall acknowledge the adjudication of cross-border data transfer under RCEP.RCEP cross-border data transfer rules provide for public policy exceptions and essential security exceptions,which may allow for policy space for China’s domestic regulation.Meanwhile,China ought to apply its regulation in a non-discriminating manner and clarify such rules as security evaluation and critical data infrastructure.Moreover,acknowledging the judiciability of RCEP cross-border data transfer clause may contribute to the avoidance of institutional discrimination.Consequently,acknowledging the judiciability is in accordance with China’s national interest,but it is still advisable to do so under the theme of reciprocity.
出处
《武大国际法评论》
2021年第6期39-55,共17页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国参与制定国际劳工标准新规则研究”(项目批准号:19ZDA136)
吉林大学劳动关系专项研究课题“国际贸易规则重构对职工权益实现影响研究”(项目批准号:2021LD010)阶段性成果。
