期刊文献+

基于2021版C-NCAP的儿童座椅静态评价研究分析 被引量:1

Research on Static Assessment of Child Restraint System Based on 2021 C-NCAP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 C-NCAP对于儿童乘员保护的重视程度越来越高,在最新版C-NCAP中,增加了儿童座椅静态评价。作为新引入的项目,2021版C-NCAP中的儿童座椅静态评价对各家车企来说非常陌生。本文目的在于帮助汽车工程师更好的理解该评价中的检查要点和意义,提升车辆儿童保护性能。本文简述了Euro-NCAP和C-NCAP中关于儿童保护评价的发展概况,对2021版C-NCAP儿童座椅静态评价相关项目、检查要点及检查意义进行了深入探讨分析,列举了评价过程中的常见问题和解决方案供车企参考。其中,ISOFIX标识和儿童座椅兼容性出现问题概率较大,现阶段车辆普遍未配置儿童座椅通讯功能。 The C-NCAP pays more and more attention to child occupant protection. In the latest version of C-NCAP, the static assessment of CRS(child restraint system) is added,which is very strange to Automobile Manufacturers as a newly introduced project. The aim of this study is to help Automotive Engineers better understand the inspections and significance in the assessment and improve the child protection performance of vehicles. This paper briefly describes the development of Euro NCAP and C-NCAP on child occupant protection assessment, deeply discusses and analyzes the relevant assessment items and inspection points,and lists the common problems and solutions in the evaluation process for vehicle enterprises’ reference. Among them, there is a high probability of problems with ISOFIX logo and CRS compatibility. At this stage, vehicles are generally not equipped with the CRS communication function.
作者 王立民 田威 王青贵 WANG Li-min;TIAN Wei;WANG Qing-gui(China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.,Ltd,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《汽车科技》 2022年第3期61-67,共7页 Auto Sci-Tech
关键词 儿童座椅 静态评价 安装适应性 儿童乘员保护 Child Restraint System Static Assessment Compatibility Child Occupant Protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1Jost J, Allsop R, Steriu M, et al. 2010 Road Safety Target Outcome: I00,000 Fewer Deaths since 2001: 5th Road Safety PIN Report. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council; 2011. 被引量:1
  • 2Euro NCAP: For Safer Cars. Available from: http://www.euroncap.com; Accessed 22.09.15. 被引量:1
  • 3European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee (EEVC). EEVC Status Report 1996; 1996. Available from: http://www.eevc.org. Accessed 22.09.15. 被引量:1
  • 4Hershman LL The U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP): past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the 17th Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Amsterdam. 2001:390. 被引量:1
  • 5Hobbs A. United Kingdom [status report] New Car Assessment Program. In: Proceedings of 15th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Melbourne, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 6Hobbs CA, McDonough PJ. Development of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP). In: Proceedings of the 16th Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Windsor. 1998. 被引量:1
  • 7Otte D, Sferco R, Schaefer R, et al. Assessment of injury severity of nearside occupants in pole impacts to side of passenger cars in European traffic acci- dents - analysis of German and UK in-depth data. In" Proceedings of the Inter- national Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV). Stuttgart. 2009. 被引量:1
  • 8National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards DOT No. 201: Occupant Protection in Interior Impact. Available from: http:[[www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/import/FMVSS; Accessed 22.09.15. 被引量:1
  • 9Euro NCAP Knee Mapping Sled Test Procedure v2.7. Available from: http:M www.euroncap.com; Accessed 22.09.15. 被引量:1
  • 10Association of European Automobile Manufacturers (ACEA). ACEA Commitment Relating to the Protection of Pedestrians and Cyclists Agreement; 2001. Available from: http:l lwww.eesc.europa.eulself-and-coregulationlfull.asp?id18. Accessed 22.09.15. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部