摘要
中国人权法学“三大体系”一体化的逻辑是,以学科体系为统领,学术体系、话语体系依次推论展开。从人权法学学科体系来看,需要突破人权法学学科体系的范式藩篱,寻找沟通人权法内外视角的渠道,由此构建人权法学元学科、一般学科、具体学科三类学科体系。从人权法学学术体系来看,在人权法学学科体系的建构工程初步完成时,需在此基础上提炼出全新的人权法学命题,包括人权代际革新命题、合作权命题、融贯模式命题,并将其系统化为人权法学学术体系。从人权法学话语体系来看,应在完成人权法学学术体系向话语体系的逻辑转换过程中,形成具有新时代中国特色的法律型人权话语、法治型人权话语和法理型人权话语,全面提升我国人权法学话语体系的感召力与说服力。
The logic of constructing the integration of ‘three systems’ of Chinese human rights law is that the discipline system is the leader, and the academic system and the discourse system are carried out sequentially. From the perspective of the discipline system of human rights law, it is necessary to break through the barriers of the paradigm of the discipline system of human rights law, find the channels of communication between the internal and external perspectives of human rights law, and thus construct the discipline system of human rights law: meta-discipline, general discipline and specific discipline. From the perspective of the academic system of human rights law, when the construction project of the subject system of human rights law is preliminarily completed, it is necessary to refine the new propositions of human rights law, such as intergenerational innovation of human rights, cooperative right and integration pattern, and systematize them into the academic system of human rights law. From the perspective of discourse system of human rights law, in the process of completing the logical transformation of the academic system to the discourse system, law-centred human rights discourse, rule-of-law-based human rights discourse and jurisprudence-based human rights discourse with Chinese characteristics in the new era are formed, so as to comprehensively improve the appeal and persuasiveness of the discourse system of human rights law in China.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期45-63,共19页
China Legal Science
基金
2020年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“‘以人民为中心’人权理念研究”(项目批准号:20JJD820008)的阶段性成果。
