期刊文献+

三级公立医院绩效考核指标中医疗质量指标及相关问题探讨 被引量:30

Discussion on Medical Quality Indicators and Related Problems in Performance Appraisal Indicators for Tertiary Public Hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三级公立医院绩效考核指标中的医疗质量指标及相关问题。方法利用文献复习和实证研究的经验对相关问题进行探讨。结果(1)三级公立医院绩效考核指标中的医疗质量指标符合国际相关权威机构对医疗质量的定义;(2)三级公立医院绩效考核指标中的医疗质量指标过少,难以全面、系统地评价三级公立医院的医疗质量现状和发展趋势;(3)三级公立医院绩效考核指标中的某些医疗质量指标存在错误。结论医疗质量是三级公立医院绩效考核最重要的维度,应参照国际医疗质量指标体系进行指标完善及数据采集。 Objective To explore the medical quality indicators and related problems in the performance evaluation indicators of tertiary public hospitals.Methods The discussion was based on a literature review and the research experiment.Results(1)The indicators of medical care quality in the“performance appraisal indicators for public tertiary hospitals”kept up with related international authorities on the definition of medical care quality and patient safety.(2)There were just a few indicators of medical care quality in the performance appraisal indicators for public tertiary hospitals,so that the indicators could not appraise medical care quality for the public tertiary hospitals comprehensively.(3)There were some mistakes and error indicators of medical care quality in the performance appraisal indicators for public tertiary hospitals.Conclusion It should redesign the indicators of medical care quality and the data acquisition system in the performance appraisal indicators for public tertiary hospitals.Index implementation and data collection should be conducted according to the International Quality Indicator Project(IQIP).
作者 马谢民 Ma Xiemin(School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing,100191,China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2022年第4期49-52,共4页 Chinese Hospital Management
关键词 三级公立医院 绩效考核 医疗质量 指标体系 tertiary public hospital performance appraisal medical quality indicator system
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1Brennan T A, Leape L L, Laird N M, et al. Incident of adverse events and negligence in-hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 370- 376. 被引量:1
  • 2Leape L L, Brennan T A, Laird N M, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 377-384. 被引量:1
  • 3Wilson R M, Runciman W B, Gibberd R W, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study [J]. Medical Journal of Australia, 1995, 163(1): 458-471. 被引量:1
  • 4Cantrill J A, Sibbald B, Buetow S. Indicators of the appropriateness of long term prescribing in general praetiee in the United Kingdom: Consensus development, face and eontent validity, feasibility and reliability[J]. Quality in Health Care, 1998(7): 130-135. 被引量:1
  • 5Kazandjian V A, Matthes N, Wicker K G.Are performance indicators generic? The international experience of the Quality Indicator Project [J]. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2003 (5): 265-276. 被引量:1
  • 6Richard Thomson, Sally Taber, Joanne Lally, et al. UK Quality In: dicator Project (UK QIP) and the UK independent healthcare sector: a new development [J ]. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004, 16: 51-56. 被引量:1
  • 7马谢民.国际医疗质量指标体系及其特点[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(11):22-24. 被引量:63
  • 8Veillard J. A performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO Regional Office for Europe PATH Project[J]. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2005, 17(6): 487-496. 被引量:1
  • 9Worhl Health Organization. Performance assessment toal for quality improvement in hospitals[R]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 10Onyetmchi A Arah. A conceptual fx'amework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project[J]. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2006, 18: 5-13. 被引量:1

共引文献143

同被引文献319

引证文献30

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部